• Druid@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Currently rewatching Gilmore Girls with my fiancée and we have the same reaction when there’s a hint of homophobia or fat jokes in some of the jokes. We usually just give each other a look and roll our eyes but yea, it was just a different time

  • null@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I had a similar reaction to seeing brown face in Ben Hur (1959). The character itself was a positive depiction, so there’s that I guess. It could have easily ruined the whole movie.

  • apparia@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m surprised how many people seem offended by this comic. I found it pretty relatable. That doesn’t mean I “don’t understand context”, or think the writers were bad people, or that the shows aren’t worth watching. It just means I find it personally unpleasant to find these jokes in a work I’m otherwise enjoying.

    When kids study older literature and media in school, generally when there’s a slur or racist reference or joke, the teacher will stop and explain the context and get the kids to reflect on it and why it’s probably not acceptable today. Even though I understand this and know it going in, I’m still kind of doing an abridged version of that in my head when something like this comes up in a show – I’ve been following along, laughing with the writers, and then suddenly I’m backing up and distancing myself from one joke or idea. It’s jarring, it pulls me out of the show, and it’s just not fun.

    In some cases it also comes across as incredibly lazy and unoriginal. So many sitcoms from that era have “the trans episode”, “the gay episode”, “the lecherous character” – and they all make the same unfunny jokes, and it’s a reminder than a lot of these shows, even in their time, were just not that creative. Plenty of modern shows have the same problem, but they don’t draw attention to it by having large classes of “stock jokes” that simply do not land today.

    • CH3DD4R_G0B-L1N@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 hours ago

      When kids study older literature and media in school, generally when there’s a slur or racist reference or joke, the teacher will stop and explain the context and get the kids to reflect on it and why it’s probably not acceptable today.

      I still remember how my English teacher gave context on usage of the n-word in Huckleberry Finn and how insightful it was for us at that age.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.auOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Comicstrips has oddly enough the most reactionary community out of anywhere on Lemmy that I’ve discovered. Often full of the worst takes from commentors outraged at decency.

  • alonsohmtz@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’s when I laugh harder.

    Tired of this neutered/sterilized “comedy” the average idiot is into these days.

    • Sv443@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      Thing is it has to be done in an actually funny way, while many of these old shows just throw in a “fuck <group of people>” as the entire joke

  • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The one that still gets me, and mostly because in this day and age of 2026 it still doesn’t get as much homophobic backlash as I feel it clearly deserves is the pejorative: cocksucker.

    In my anecdotal experience, 99.55% of the time, it’s leveraged against men and used as a homophobic slur.

    But even so, is sucking cock really that terrible of a thing to do? The vast majority of people with a cock enjoy the service. We literally celebrate the people who do it well for us personally, in most cases.

    Why is it used as a slur?

    Anyway, I’m off to suck some cock, see ya’ll later.

    • alonsohmtz@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It usually implies that whoever is giving head is being taken advantage of.

      i.e. They got swindled by some shitty male into pleasing said male at the cost of their own dignity.

      It doesn’t happen always, but it happens often enough for the act to be seen as degrading.

      • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        I took it to mean that the person referred to is an opportunist of sorts. A man who will perform said act on another man for some kind of benefit, despite being straight or disliking that man.

    • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Safe travels, cocksucker!

      (Mods, please don’t ban me. Please observe the context. Oh my god please jesus don’t do it)

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      George Carlin (who is idolized and rightly so, mostly) had a line in one of his standup specials where he said “you show me a tropical fruit and I’ll show you a cocksucker from Guatemala”. Homophobia was just so normalized back then (this was the ‘80s). Eddie Murphy had a whole routine (which he has since apologized for, to his credit) imagining Mr. T as a homosexual ("Hey boy you lookin’ mighty cute in them jeans!"). Robin Williams (also idolized here) routinely acted gay for the humor value of it (such as it was).

      • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yep! And that’s part of the culture I grew up in and came to age in. Media that demonized and mocked gay men (and really all gay people), even otherwise progressive and lighthearted media.

        It was damaging to me as a child. More so than a lot of people could ever realize.

        Also disheartening is that a lot of my super religious family will use the term cocksucker as a derogatory statement right in front of me, knowing I’m gay. These are the same exact people who literally freak out and act like you’ve shot their mother in front of them if you say the word “fuck” or “god damn”.

        • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          Cocksucker is just a good word to say; in my language the word for Cancer (yes we curse with that) is used in the same way and is also very controversial.

    • wabasso@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’m interested in the viewpoints of gay men on this. I’m happy to retire the term (I don’t even know if I’ve ever actually used it), but it would be good to know if folks are actually getting offended by it.

      In modern times I take it to be derogatory in an “involuntary submissive” context. One who sucks cock not because they want to, but because they are in some situation where they must.

    • itistime@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Why is it used as a slur?

      Easiest way to push their buttons. One may not care if another sucks cock, but if they’re insecure like these folks, then it is very effective.

      • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Growing up, the worst thing you could be was a guy who liked other dudes. Being called a fag and cocksucker was just like “casual” insults, the way Australians call someone a cunt.

        I kind of like when it’s reclaimed. Like someone calling themselves a fag or a whore.

        Because usually the bully ends up getting even more mad.

      • NannerBanner@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        interestingly, it’s less about flexibility and more about ‘strength.’ There was a how-to guide a while ago that emphasized the method of ‘hands behind thighs’ to pull oneself to that point. Leverage and body mechanics make it pretty difficult, and flexibility isn’t even half of the battle.

    • psilotop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      While the issue you bring up is legit…what sitcom ever used that word? I feel like that would only ever be in an R rated movie

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    90s? I went into my rewatch of How I Met Your Mother knowing it was problematic, but the entire show is basically just one long sexist joke with a disappointing ending.

      • The Stoned Hacker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        yeah i watched this show as kid with my dad and we both enjoyed it a lot (and i idolized Barney, although mostly his suits) but looking back theres so much sexual coercion and blatant lying for sex that idk if i could stomach the show nowadays

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That’s like, your opinion, man. It’s not a universally agreed-on rule.

      New York Times Manual of Style and Usage (1999):

      decades should usually be given in numerals: the 1990’s; the mid-1970’s; the 90’s. But when a decade begins a sentence it must be spelled out.

      The Chicago Manual of Style (2003):

      9.37 Decades. Decades are either spelled out (as long as the century is clear) and lowercased or expressed in numerals. No apostrophe appears between the year and the s.

      Same goes for initialisms, e.g. CDs vs CD’s.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The CD’s (singular) tracks and the CDs’ (plural) tracks. Or would it be CD’s’? That’s my one gripe with putting the apostrophe s for acronyms.

        But then when talking about someone getting “all As” in school, it’s easy there to realize what’s being said, but when someone asks “What grades did you get in school?” And you respond “As,” now it’s just the word as.

        Grammarizing spoken word is a major part of my job and I think about this shit all the time, and sometimes things conflict, and it’s dumb, it’s all dumb! That’s it!

        • Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          But then when talking about someone getting “all As” in school, it’s easy there to realize what’s being said

          Some would think that there is supposed to be a ’ in there but no, the additional “s” is simply missing.

      • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Posting this here because this is the most recent instance: every time I see deleted by creator on Lemmy, my first thought is always “damn, God REALLY did not like that comment.”

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’m gonna say something bold:

    Surprisingly not a problem for some shows, good example is Simpson golden age.

    There is a gay episode but it’s mostly about Homer overreacting.

    A lot of the satire of Simpson is trying to be functional in a dysfunctional system, which has aged like the greatest wine that frank grimes can’t afford.

      • null@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Apu is tough because I know at least a dozen people just like him who own their own store and are somehow behind the counter every single time I walk in.

    • Goatboy@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I think a lot of the time it’s Gen Z not understanding context. There was overt racism, but a lot of media that is considered racist now was either depicting the experience of people at the time or making fun of racists.

      • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Blazing Saddles. Took me a bit to understand this when I was younger. When I first saw it, I thought it was simply outdated humor. Then I thought it was edgy. Then I finally grasped that the whole joke is actually directed at racist white folks and that their racism just makes them look really stupid.

        • Goatboy@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          The quintessential example. Rocky Horror is another.

          I’d also include the controversy around “Baby It’s Cold Outside”.

            • null@lemmy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              The song has a line where the girl asks what’s in her drink. You can interpret that however you want.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yeah, if you find an overly racist character then the joke is probably directed at them being racist.

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It’s amazing how many people are offended by Uncle Ruckus. Like, way more than are offended by Uncle Remus, incredibly enough.

          • alonsohmtz@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The Boondocks just isn’t a show for the emasculated generation.

            It wouldn’t have gotten made if they were in charge.

      • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’d say that’s mostly true for comedy. But some of the earlier stuff was definitely like “point and laugh at this race”. Like the original looney tunes and stuff had some that were rough. They got better about it later but those early episodes had a few that were a little…close lol

        • blady_blah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 hours ago

          But that wasn’t in the '90s. The last thing I can actually think of as an example of point-and-laugh at a race was Breakfast at Tiffany’s (1961). In the '80s there was Dukes of Hazzard, but it wasn’t overtly racist, they just only had black people as bad guys in the deep South. As a kid that went right over my head.

          I think most examples in the '90s would be stereotyping races but not making fun of them. Overtly. Kind of like the token Asian or the token black guy to fill out a group of friends. I guess I want more examples to be given because when you’re younger a lot of that stuff goes of your head compared to when you’re older.

            • blady_blah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Sorry my statement wasn’t that the only villains were black people, but rather that when black people were on the show they were always villains.

              • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                31 minutes ago

                I’ll take your word on that.

                Separate but related. I just looked at the cast from the 80s. There is a distinct lack of black actors in general.

      • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Id be careful blaming the newer generation. That’s what those snowflake boomers did, saying shit like, “Oh those millennials… We can’t even make a joke anymore” because their jokes suck ass, those little bitches.

      • presoak@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Well Gen Z is quite young. Children understand trigger-words more, subtle context less so.

        • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 minutes ago

          Ageism on Lemmy, impossible.

          As the other commenter has said, the youngest gen z aren’t children anymore - they’re teens.

          • Goatboy@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I’m only just beginning to understand what L.P Hartley meant when he said “The past is a foreign country”

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      We can put King of the Hill in that camp as well I think.

      I think it’s a better and more rounded show than any of them.

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s a bit awkward, because Kahn was Toby Huss doing a problematic accent, but is also generally praised for representation of SEA culture.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I feel like every time I tried watching Big Bang Theory, I got this vibe.

    “haha that guy is such a fucking nerd!” was virtually every laugh-track riddled joke.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I think Breaking Bad belongs in the middle one with Futurama because I don’t think it required intelligence to be entertained.

        My first watch through was purely a “watch Hal do some crazy shit” where the action entertained and everything else was just an annoyance. I just didn’t care about the moral implications or whatever message the show was trying to make, I was happy watching an “outsider enters dangerous world he knows little about and fucks shit up”.

        Second watch through I stopped seeing him as Hal and disliked him before the end of the first episode. If anything, he was more like Malcolm (book smart but otherwise dumb and entitled).

        Though maybe that’s more just about BB being entertaining even if you aren’t the target audience.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.auOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Hey that’s not fair to BBT, half of those jokes were “Sheldon is neurodiverse”

        • Bgugi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Because if you acknowledge that he’s autistic, then a LOT of the series becomes “laugh at a nasty charicature of a disabled person.”

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            That’s how the representation should be handled.

            This guy is awkward but has all these friends, they laugh and sometimes don’t understand him but they’re still friends.

            If the show could be that progressive about neurodivergence then it might actually be good.

    • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      He said hello hahahahhahahaa…hahahahahaha omg omg bro omg he said- he said hahaha he said HELLO hahahaha

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I will always defend BBT as 6 seasons of a great show dragged out and dumbed down for prime time. I think if someone went through it and discarded the filler jokes, arcs that go nowhere and excessive laugh track it could have been really good.

      My wife likes the show as background noise and I’ve studied it. Theres some real relationship writing and some genuinely good character growth, some of the non “Ha! Nerds!” Jokes are actually pretty funny.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I wish I could get people to care about health care and wages as much as they care about mean words. So many seemingly don’t mind being robbed blind as long as our ruling parties using the correct terminology.

    • alonsohmtz@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The same people who care more about mean words than reducing the disparity in the wealth are the ones profiting off of the disparity in wealth.

      Everyone loves money, including gays, blacks, and women.

    • SamemaS@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      What, and give up purity testing? That would eliminate 90% of our recreational outrage and give us time and energy to actually do something. Can’t have that.

      • presoak@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Without my sexual identity and virtue signaling I wouldn’t have any personality at all.

        • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          51 minutes ago

          What’s funny is it’s literally a shared behavior across the entire political spectrum in America but each side pretends it’s only the other side doing it.

    • PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      15 hours ago

      As Talleyrand once said: “An important art of politicians is to find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the public.”

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah, all the word policing kinda feels like a psyop because it’s stirring up a lot of conflict without any real benefit. Controlling what words are ok doesn’t make people respect the ones hurt by the words, and ultimately it’s the disrespect that causes the hurt, the words are just the manifestation of that.

      Like with disabled people, pretty much every word used to describe them has become an insult and any new word will just suffer the same fate pretty much the same day it gets popularized.

      But the argument itself is polarizing, though in a way that makes the other side shut up about it until they can find like minded people. And might end up joining MAGA because they think it’s about trolling people policing language and words like “woke” end up having very different meanings to the different groups (one side sees it as a respect for all regardless of background or capabilities, the other sees it as a drive for censorship) to the point where people supporting the other side seem “evil”, which then means that as MAGAs wake up and see it is about more than just policing words, their opponents are more likely to tell them to fuck off than.

      And that’s not even mentioning the people who take the stance “my racism/sexism is ok because it’s against the race/gender with more power”, and the people who treat non-malicious acknowledgement of differences between genders/races/cultures the same as malicious ones and no fucking wonder there’s strong opposition.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Those topics are simple and easy to understand.

      Understanding the long arc of the oppression of the labor class and the systemic design failures of US Healthcare is hard and the explanation won’t fit in a TikTok.

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    146
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Early 2000s entertainment too. A good portion of the edgy jokes could be considered funny because they were made on the assumption that “We can laugh about this, because we all know racism and sexism is bad, right?”.

    And then 2015ish happened and it became obvious that a lot of people weren’t laughing AT the -isms but rather WITH.

    EDIT: Which slur did Ross use, BTW? I haven’t watched that show in eons, and I don’t remember any.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I have collected so many of the movies I remember fondly as a Gen X’er. From the ‘70s to the ‘90s. Holy shit the stuff I’d forgotten that was in them. Rape-y stuff, comments about underage girls and basically leering at them with tbe camera, suicides, misogyny, women as sexual objects and nothing else, racism… It’s bad. I’d started a movie or two with my kids and had a “oh no” moment when a part started that I’d completely forgotten about. Some of that still exists, but it’s there as a narrative and plot point about the character doing the shitty things rather than the casual and institutional way it was played before. Just goes to show you how times and people (can; some don’t) change. Some of that stuff was not unusual in life for me back then, I wouldn’t dream of it today.

    • phx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah I was pretty sure the key master/gatekeeper stuff would go over my kids’ heads but I forgot about the ghost-sex scene.

      Ironically, other stuff with a high rating is actually due to blood/gore but the other content is pretty low-key. I’d rather they watch Terminator than a lot of the “funny” stuff

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        What we consider funny has shifted quite a bit, at least publicly and for decent people. There are still plenty who are perfectly fine with lowbrow racism and all that as far as what constitutes humor.

    • presoak@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Check out “Fiend Without A Face 1958”. You’ll thank me. I don’t care about the precise context of this reply.

    • presoak@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      This is an important point.

      But what if the racism etc makes the joke. And it’s a funny joke.That makes it ok. Because humor trumps that other stuff.

  • frog@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Seinfeld is in the top of my list. Kramer can show up in black face and they left the episode in but someone can’t be a dark elf in Community.

    They also had Kramer making the Native American noises and stomping the Puerto Rican flag. Basically anything racist, they had the racist guy do. And it was okay because he looked like he had mental health issues.

    • MBM@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Huh? The whole joke with Chang going as a dark elf was that it was blackface and it made Shirley uncomfortable. I don’t think it should’ve been removed because Chang was the punchline and not black people, but it was definitely about blackface. (I’ve also not heard anyone complain about that joke)

      • presoak@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Remember when references substituted for humor? I think the same thing happened for moralness or something. The symbol became accepted as being as real as the actual thing. Which is completely psychotic of course.

    • PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      That flag episode the joke was that everything he was doing was taken the wrong way. He had accidentally set on fire a flag that was behind him and tried to put out the fire, then someone shouts “Hey, there’s a guy stomping the Puerto Rican flag!” and he is chased by a mob…

      It’s like that Monk episode where he has to shake hands with a lot of people from a group and the last one is black, and right after shaking hands with the black person he cleans his hands with rubbing alcohol, so everyone thinks he is racist and everything he does in the episode just makes him look even worse - because it was taken out of context (he is a germophobe, he cleans his hands with rubbing alcohol after touching anything and anyone).

      • frog@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The episode where he was in black face was also Kramer having an “accident”. Kramer is a device the writers’ had to make racist jokes.

        If you want to do something racist just go backwards. For example, “Let’s have Kramer be in black face during a Martin Luther King walk! It’s okay becuse he didn’t do it on purpose!”

        The writers created the situation. You can’t just say anything was accidental. That’s like those comedians that just keep saying, “It’s just a joke.” I mean look at Michael Richards’ infamous standup. Perfect example.

        • PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I don’t think I watched the blackface episode, but if it was an accident that caused a misunderstanding (basic comedy trope) the joke was on people being over sensitive and raging without knowing and/or purposely ignoring context of a situation (I could as easily say “if you want to do something racist, just claim it was a dark elf”). What was being criticized there became the norm, and the consequences are in this thread - people can’t say the name of that Agatha Christie’s work in the comments, nor you can have a dark elf in Community, because context doesn’t matter.

          • nexguy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            17 hours ago

            If i remember Cramer accidentally had to much tanning spray on his face(and didn’t look in the mirror I think) or something like that then went to meet his girlfriends black family.

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The entire point of a reality sitcom is that it takes place in reality.

      Reality has racists. Racism is part of life. There is a difference between a racist character doing a bit because that is what the character would do. Vs a show that is racist because the writers and directors are racist.

      Comedy has done dark humor and racist humor for 1000 years. If you stop allowing it, then you unironically actually just empower actual racists because your now removing a tool to undermine the racism.

      Yeah it sucks when the racist joke or bit is done poorly and lacks the context or nuance to either shine a light on a problem, subvert expections or point out a flaw in society. Thus coming across as just crass.

      But not every attempt is going to land.

      • presoak@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        What if we just, as a society, accepted racism as a valid expression? Not literal truth but metaphorical and figurative. Could we do that and avoid offending everybody? Because, as you say, it would help us do humor. And humor is important.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        This is the point cancel culture misses (and I absolutely support some cancellations).

        Throwing it back even further, Blazing Saddles is a great example of a writer/director and some of the best comedy actors of all time using racism to undermine racism.

      • frog@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I agree with you. I don’t believe in canceling shows. That why I don’t think removing the dark elf episode on Community should have been allowed.

        But at the same time as allowing what was considered socially acceptable, I should be able to express my discomfort with content.