I mean… isn’t it just logical that if you express yourself ambiguously, you are more likely to get a poor response? Humans and chatbots alike need clarity to respond appropriately. I don’t think we can ever expect things to work differently.

That’s a somewhat odd statement coming from a stranger on the internet but I’m having one of those days where I’ll take anything that’s on offer. So thanks, I think I needed to hear that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullshit_Jobs

Graeber states that more than half of societal work is pointless, both large parts of some jobs and five types of entirely pointless jobs:

• Flunkies, who serve to make their superiors feel important, e.g., receptionists, administrative assistants, door attendants, store greeters;
• Goons, who act to harm or deceive others on behalf of their employer, or to prevent other goons from doing so, e.g., lobbyists, corporate lawyers, telemarketers, public relations specialists;
• Duct tapers, who temporarily fix problems that could be fixed permanently, e.g., programmers repairing shoddy code, airline desk staff who calm passengers with lost luggage;
• Box tickers, who create the appearance that something useful is being done when it is not, e.g., survey administrators, in-house magazine journalists, corporate compliance officers, academic administration;[14]
• Taskmasters, who create extra work for those who do not need it, e.g., middle management, leadership professionals.[1][4]

People say they slept like a baby, but have you ever slept like a hamster?

This sounds like a US thing, not an AI thing

I mean if they’re reading books in the first place you’re probably already in the clear

You: Cool! The entrance to the subway is around the corner.

Bob: Thanks for the help, friend!

You: You’re welcome! Good luck.

Are you implying that gold isolates better from interference than copper?