Well the civil war pretty clearly established this and if we try we would absolutely have to fight and win a multi year war during which in addition to millions or tens of millions of deaths there would be ample pretext to not count our votes. We would seem folks herded into death camps which nukes would insure nobody would liberate.

Our military would be firmly on the side of compliance with the law which they voted for 2 to 1 and we would lose.

Pretty obviously in context Washington state

You can vote so you can vote for local people. You can even sometimes vote between 2 Republicans to try to get the less shitty one and also vote to send a message

Voting third parties don’t put any butts in seats and therefore do nothing. For example green has literally NEVER put someone in a federal office iin their 40 year existence.

In the recycling example its a sham because the net effect of all individual parties recycling is bubkis whereas with voting the net effect of another 1% getting to the polls turns the entire thing around.

We are absolutely at fault for not understanding the meaning of our choices…

We can’t do that

The candidates job isn’t to teach you that allowing Hitler to come to power is a worst case scenario nor is it their fault if you fail to realize that. The candidate got one vote just like you

Why would you vote for a party which has never and will never hold federal office?

We don’t allow this in WA for instance.

Fast food workers like subsay aren’t generally aren’t tipped or paid under minimum

You’ve identified why. If you are able get some tools doing stuff yourself is in general fun

No. They don’t actually use sources and can’t tell you why they said what they said. This actually reverses cause and effect the source is part of the inference and since it didn’t and in fact can’t go and read them frequently contains both imaginary sources and sources which don’t actually support the assertion.

The ability to evaluate the source requires the same skills and information as the production of the original text would have required which means perforce if you use chatGPT to produce text which you lack the skills to produce you also lack the skills to evaluate it.

You COULD go and read primary sources and in turn evaluate it but at that point its not that quick.