• eleijeep@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    248
    ·
    1 day ago

    Judge Carolyn Kuhl, who is presiding over the trial, ordered anyone in the courtroom wearing AI glasses to immediately remove them, noting that any use of facial recognition technology to identify the jurors was banned.

    “This is very serious,” she said.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 hours ago

      noting that any use of facial recognition technology to identify the jurors was banned

      For that reason alone, she should have held them in contempt and declared a mistrial before wasting anyone else’s time.

      Zuck and his crew should’ve been arrested on-site for such an egregious breach of privacy and mockery of the justice system. And the next set of jurors should’ve been immediately informed of why there was a mistrial, and the very obvious danger of the defendant having even one frame of video with a jurors face in it.

      Instead, he got free viral marketing.

      What a fucking clownshow.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Each and every individual should have been arrested then and there. Imagine walking into a major criminal trial with a film camera on your shoulder.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Isn’t it usual procedure that everyone else enters the courtroom and takes their places before the judge walks in? So the team would have had ample opportunity to film, record and facially-recognize the jury before Judge Kuhl made them take off the spyglasses.

      • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        46 minutes ago

        The judge controls when the jury is in the room. So the jury enters last, only after the judge orders them in. And the judge can order them out at any time to have discussions outside their presence, too.

      • Rhonda Sandtits@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The Judge also ordered them to dispose of anything they had already recorded.
        No way of actually checking that they did delete anything, but the possibility of footage or photos being leaked by a disgruntled worker, etc would be a massive liability for those two idiots.

        • Kissaki@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          No way of actually checking that they did delete anything

          Not a random individual, but I would expect a court to be able to do so. Hold them, get an expert, verify.