• bearboiblake [he/him]@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    3 days ago

    My mistake, you’re absolutely right – I neglected to ensure the runway was clear before scheduling that landing. Please accept my apologies for causing those deaths. I’m really glad to be working with you, it’s reassuring that you’ll always keep me honest. You’re not just an assistant traffic controller – you’re a friend.

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I watched the lord of the ring movies this weekend for the first time. Extended versions with my friends.

      Wtf is wrong with people who name their company, possibly their life’s work, after the evil eye of the big bad evil guy?

      • auntieclokwise@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        Technically, the Palantiri weren’t the evil eye of the Sauron. Sauron and Saruman did use them (and that’s why you see Sauron’s eye in one of them), but the stones themselves were basically just communication and surveillance devices. They were, themselves, fairly neutral and not made by anyone especially evil (probably Feanor - flawed but not evil). But they were used for evil purposes during the time in the LOTR trilogy.

      • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        The palantiri themselves aren’t inherently evil; Sauron was just a master of deception and used them as propaganda devices

      • 87Six@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        You think batman having a hidden lair as literally the tallest building around is unrealistic until you see what modern corporations are like

    • limer@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s because this news site is owned by a multinational company, which owns several other publications. They sell advertising and not reform

    • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      No they didn’t.

      Later, a person familiar with the matter told Bloomberg the Federal Aviation Administration had brought on Palantir, Thales SA, and Air Space Intelligence to compete for the SMART contract. Palantir then released a statement to investors confirming the company was contracted by the FAA to “provide a data analytics tool that will help advance the agency’s modernization objectives for aviation safety.”

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 days ago

    We don’t have enough air traffic controllers.

    We use AI to reduce their workload. <---- We are here

    We don’t need as many air traffic controllers.

    We sack more air traffic controllers.

    We don’t have enough air traffic controllers.

  • darthsundhaft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    What I’m hearing is, they will literally risk people dying on planes just to train AI AND would rather do that than hire/employ actual staff that will do the work. Somehow, paying their staff a liveable wage and treating them like a human being just doesn’t bode well enough for the rich people making these decisions.

    This is fucking insane. I bet you that none of the places with private jets flying all these asshole c-suite execs are using AI. It’s only being forced on the public because the idiots bought into the hype and don’t know how else to make money out of it.

    • redsand@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      Actually no them too. Peter Theil is shockingly stupid and crazy. He believes it’ll work and if it doesn’t he’s so special nothing bad can happen to him

      • auntieclokwise@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 days ago

        That would be one of the biggest ironies in history if Peter Theil ends up dying because the AI ATC he championed crashed him into some other evil exec. I’m thinking maybe Elon Musk.

      • Burninator05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        …nothing bad can happen to him

        Honest question: When was the last time something bad actually happened to these people?

        • DiarrheaSommelier@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          3 days ago

          That submarine imploded under the unbearable weight of a billionaire’s hubris. The world got ever so slightly better that day.

          Is there a way to convince more billionaires that 3rd-rate carbon fiber is a great building material for compression-loaded pressure vessels?

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            epstein still continues to haunt gop/trump and other world leaders from beyond the grave. the fact that ghislaine hasnt been offed yet is because getting rid of her will just increase scrutiny on the epstein files.

            • redsand@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              You have reading to do. Did you see the 9/11 shadow commission email? Know anything about Maxwell’s dad, had a real interesting funeral and life. Or her sister and what those companies do? Did you see the map of greater Israel in Epstein’s house? Framed 9/11 news paper? Rothschild couple emailing about hunting humans?

              That’s just big ticket shit.

              There’s a picture of Jeffrey in an ambulance with a heart monitor live and in tachycardia recently and bank accounts that’s movement has not been explained.

              Oh the safe, that’s a huge one. The FBI busted open and packed the contents into two suitcases which sat in Epstein’s house then were moved to his account’s house then sat there a few days then makes it’s way back to the FBI with a box of CDs now explained as not properly logged.

              Also Mossad’s surveillance on Epstein’s homes and Epstein’s body guard training at the CIA who Epstein sued because…

              That’s just off the top of my head in under 5min. Go read. Or watch don’t look up

              Maxwell is Mossad, Israel is going to annex Lebanon and Jeffrey was CIA (cries but the CIA can’t operate on US soil) to which I say, ever heard of the franklin incident? Ghislaine is a queen awaiting pardon.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Its simpler than that. They are prioritizing the “economy” over anything else, which leads to this type of decision making. The shortage is fixed for less money than if they hired more people, the money goes to AI companies propping them up further, and the “stock market” continues to climb.

      Its an entirely flawed way of thinking and living and that’s what needs to change. Right now the largest impact on changing this is simply older generations dieing off, as many are too old to change their entire moral system.

  • GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    Let’s say the error rate is 0.1%. Pretty low, right. But that’s one mistake per thousand flights. Are they really okay with one plane out of a thousand potentially crashing? There are certain industries and jobs where AI simply cannot and should not be used.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Each day, about 100-120 people die in car crashes in America.

      Over 45,000 planes fly in America every day, and over 5000 are in the air at any given moment. With a crash rate of 1 out of a thousand, we’d be having multiple plane crashes, with thousands of people killed, every day. One plane crash could easily match or surpass that daily car crash number, and we’d be having multiple plane crashes per day.

      1 out of a thousand? I’d never fly again. NOBODY would ever fly again.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        The worst part would be that it doesn’t matter if you fly or not - as long as a plane can fly above you, you’re at risk. None of us are safe.

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Normally, I would scoff at being worried about airborne debris, but if 1 out of 1000 were crashing, and there were 45k flights a day, that’s enough crashes to worry about.

          The vast majority of those crashes would be around airports, though, so just keep away from the airports, and your chance of being clobbered by a black box goes down significantly.

          It’s almost comical to think about major airports having a half dozen crashes a day. At least the AI won’t have any trouble sleeping at night.

    • Napster153@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sarcasm:

      But think of the insurance people! Look at how many insurances are waiting to be denied and robbed!

      More importantly, we can justify every other profit increase, because our economies are built on literal exploitation just as they did a couple hundred years prior!

      Modern exploiting problems require modern idol solutions.

      • Heikki2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sadly there is part of the population that will view that as a valid argument. Faux News, news max, OAN and all the conservative talk radio will feed it to them

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Even further: the biggest problem with AI and thus the biggest decider on its suitability or not for something is that its distribution of failure in terms of consequence is uniform rather than it being more likely to err in ways with few or less grevious consequences than in ways with more or worse consequences.

      In other words, unlike humans who activelly try and avoid making the nastiest and deadly mistakes, when AI fails, it can fail just as easilly in the most horrible and deadly ways as it can in the most minor of ways.

      That’s why you have lots of instances of LLMs giving what for humans are obviously dangerous advice like telling people to put glue on pizza to make it look good or those with suicidal thoughts to kill themselves - unlike humans AI has no mechanism to detect “obviously dangerous” on an output it’s about to produce and generate a different output instead.

      This is why using AI to generate fluff filling for e-mails is fine but it’s not fine in systems were errors can easilly cost lives.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, he’s got a lot to answer for in Hell.

        I wish I believed in that stuff. It would so satisfying to know that those dipshits are suffering, but they aren’t.

        We can’t count on these jackals getting punished in the next life, we have to take care of it ourselves. Make them think Hell will be a vacation.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Oh, he definitely did. But you can never underestimate the power of ANY politician to fuck things up WORSE.

      It’s kind of their superpower.

    • FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hi. I dont know shit about flying or the demands of personnel in a control tower (especially at a place like atl). I’m also fairly anti-AI for various reasons. But it seems to me, from ground level and with a view of the trees, that AI would be better at juggling all of the data and variables of planes in the sky, compared to a moron like me. Given that you’re a pilot, can you help me understand why that’s not the case?

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        There’s an IMMENSE amount of human interaction in air traffic control. The thing AI is the absolute worst at.

        The only real way it could work is if everything was turned over to computers. And we’re not there yet.

      • dreamkeeper@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Do you actually use AI? Even the most advanced models constantly make mistakes. And not small ones either

        These AIs are language models, they are not good at making decisions that require live context or a memory longer than 5 minutes.

      • III@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        AI doesn’t juggle data and variables very well, add the fact you have been lied to about what AI does to your list of reasons.

      • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah I could imagine well made traffic management software could be a real positive. But we all know AI shits the bed sometimes, it should always be overseen by human controllers.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    I tried to use AI to install a reverse osmosis water system yesterday, I asked it to look at manual for hose colors to match them, I figured it would save me a few mins.

    After an hour of it not working and trying all sorts of nonsense I looked in manual to have it show me it had given me all the wrong information to a simple task.

    I can’t wait to have people’s lives reliant on this technology.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      AI is a pretty big catch-all term. If they mean specially designed and trained deep learning neural nets, maaaaybe it’ll be okay. If they mean typical LLMs we’re straight up fucked.

      • RogueJello@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Exactly. With a broad enough term those computerized screens showing the position of all the planes is “AI”.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I watch an art restorer out of Chicago on youtube, and he’s developing his own AI to help restorers. He says it’s a closed system. Is that something that could work? I’ve been wondering about that since he announced. (Baumgartner, if you’re interested).

    • phx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I just saw an ad for using ChatGPT to “come up with new recipes and baking ideas”

      Yeah I’m sure having a bunch of people decide to eat whatever a hallucinating AI comes up with isn’t going to be dangerous at all…

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I’ll look it up and try to find it. But I’m pretty sure there’s a YouTube video where they actually did ask Chat GPT to come up with new recipes and baking ideas and then they tried to make them to the results you would expect.

        Edit: ok, so it looks like there are a whole lot of YouTubers making AI recipes to the expected results. So Google away.