Dude, expecting fucking HUMAN drivers to respect bike lanes is too high a bar.
AI companies: Our AI is so powerful, it could take over the world if we don’t regulate it
Also AI companies: Bike lanes scary
It can’t run a vending machine but we’re going to let it make life-or-death decisions.
Didn’t used to be able to run a vending machine. They turned the vending machine scenario into a benchmark…
That’s a shame. Back to human drivers then.
Well, if Waymo can’t comply with proper street conduct, its services should be banned from public roads until they are ready and capable of complying with them.
To be fair human drivers don’t respect bike lanes either.
So it’s a dead end technology then? Got it. Get em off the road.
Expecting people to not sabotage the rolling death machines “too high a bar”
But Waymo taxis are demonstrably safer than human drivers.
Maybe you’re thinking of Tesla who’s significantly worse than human drivers because they ditched LIDAR.
Sofas are even safer, but sofas should fuck off out of the bike lane too. And out of the bus lane too, but that’s never going to happen.
But Waymo taxis are demonstrably safer than human drivers.
… says research paid for by Waymo.
I know critical thinking skills are in short supply these days, but come on.
I made a previous post about this. Anecdotally, I’ve seen numerous human drivers hit pedestrians in SF. Number of Waymos hitting humans that I have seen in local news or in person, none.
They are very very conservative with their driving in SF but can still navigate SFs complex streets (I.e. when a doordash is parallel parked theyre very good at driving around them).
That’s why you have to standardize the statistics.
Humans are responsible for more total pedestrian crashes than robo taxis simply because there’s more human drivers on the road.
Although the standardized statistics agree with your anecdotal observations in this case.
I don’t know why you are trying to defend human drivers so much. I share the road whit them every day and I hope to fucking God they all get replaced with robots soon.
I’m not trying to defend human drivers; I’m all for all human drivers being replaced.
That’s not critical thinking. It’s making an assumption based on bias.
I was just going to say that the roads are for humans, not machines, but this is a better idea.
I guess necessary bike safety gear needs to include a brick
I walk my dog with a pocket full of rocks to throw at cars.
Can’t afford bricks. There’s a war on.
Once you collect a poo bag from your dog, you can just throw that.
I actually have a small but bright orange hatchet (I spray it to help keep rust off it and also to make it super easy to spot from the other side of my campsite) I keep on my bag, mostly for Camping, but I use the same bag when I’m on my bike.
I’ve started keeping it on, and have seemingly had less people giving me shit when I’m biking through town.
Do be evil, an hero will destroy you
Won’t succeed here in the Netherlands then
I don’t think it’ll succeed in a developed country in general
no problem, don’t expect me to respect driverless taxis then
I can fuk a car up pretty good, so they’ll learn how to “respect” me at least
Until the AI goes full-on Christine
Totally out of curiosity as I ask a lot of questions. I’m assuming these also have to be roadworthy. Can they drive with a light out or a damaged or a missing windscreen wiper?
What kinda damage would take these out of action for small period? Or cost the most in terms of repair?
Also if one had a ‘I support Palestine action’ sticker on it, would it be considered a car displaying a terrorist message?
They stop and can’t move again with a cone on the hood.
Do with that information what you will.
These cars aren’t looking through the windscreen. They’re covered in sensors and probably use LIDAR system to navigate. They see in the dark and through fog.
It’s fairly obvious where the sensors are located looking at the car. And because these cars are dumb as hell, it takes relatively little to disrupt their ability to tell the difference between say, a person the car has to stop for, and a cardboard cutout of Scott Bacula. Or a traffic cone, as another user mentioned though that particular exploit may have been patched out by now.
I would assume though if they are used to carry passengers then a small break in any of the windows would count as dangerous? and it least impact insurance claims?
Someone is going to spray paint dicks on them
I thinking more of using their authoritative info structures against them.
Personal injury lawyers:
don’t mind if I do
Respect goes both ways.
This is such an eloquent response. It’s give you more than one up vote if I could
