• SarcasticMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    174
    ·
    6 days ago

    Oh yes, world renowned theologian James David Vance foremost expert on theol…wait theology is when you fuck couches right?

  • finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    6 days ago

    Isn’t the Pope supposed to be the guy for Catholics, appointed to directly hear God’s voice on Earth, and spread it to the masses? And if that’s the case, aren’t all these faux-Christians disagreeing with him - like Vance - disagreeing with the very God they purport to worship?

    • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      134
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Catholics can disagree with the pope on secular matters, the problem here is that the pope is quoting the catechism almost verbatim, and convert-boy is throwing a tantrum because he joined the church based on aesthetics and not any kind of conviction.

    • Infrapink@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      6 days ago

      A bunch of Protestants think the Pope is the Antichrist, but apparently Vance identifies as Catholic, so yeah, he’s defying God. Catholic doctrine also holds that the Pope is infallible when ruling on theology.

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        The latter is not universal. Several popes have explicitly stated that they are indeed fallible (which would render total infallibility self-contradictory). Also, infallibility is generally limited in certain ways that I won’t bother researching in enough depth to put into a concise description. But the pope can’t just make up some random shit and have it automatically considered to be the word of God.

        Of course, pointing out that someone violates the basic tenets of Catholicism while naming those specific tenets is well within “the pope is right” territory.

        • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          6 days ago

          Pretty sure the infallibility part is only when he speaks “ex cathedra” which is a pretty narrow and specific time, but I’m not a Catholic.

          A quick Google says the last time that was done was in 1950.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            5 days ago

            And that’s why francis had to clarify that he wasn’t speaking infallibly when he said he hoped hell was empty

        • LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          I appreciate the nuanced info. It’s pretty tough to find when discussing religion on platforms like this. It helps logical people trapped by corrupted religious beliefs realize that its okay, even encouraged, to keep their core beliefs intact while still being able to condemn those within their religion that work to corrupt the church.

          If all you see is church/religion bad, then they’ll just dismiss you and move on. And the corrupt version of Christianity or Islam or Judaism or what have you will continue growing

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      6 days ago

      The man converted to catholicism then within a few years was beefing with two popes in a row on basic catholicism.

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      The American Catholic leadership are hardcore conservative, with a few exceptions, and working at cross purposes with Christ’s mission on earth.

      • 1D10@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 days ago

        In my experience American catholics in general tend to be the ones who vote hard right, while saying “I think politics is tearing us apart” and “oh, I don’t discuss politics” “I’m not racist, but…”. They want the same thing the far righ wants they just don’t want to get their hands dirty.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Literally any Catholic who criticizes the Pope is a hypocrite because the Pope is meant to be God’s representative/mouthpiece on Earth.

          • theneverfox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Where did doctrine that come from? I’m not sure where you’re getting it. Kinda sounds made the fuck up

            You can absolutely criticize the pope as a Catholic. What you can’t do is attempt to supercede him on matters of faith

            Which, you know, we’ve got people doing that already, no need to make shit up

    • LordMayor@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 days ago

      Right? Is he not treading excommunication territory with this shit?

      Lay Catholics aren’t supposed to challenge the Pope like that. Even Cardinals wouldn’t get away with saying something so obnoxious.

  • dizzle18@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    5 days ago

    JD literally woke up one morning and decided to debate theology with the fucking Vicar of Christ.

    • SippyCup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      5 days ago

      INNNNN THIS CORNER, wearing all white and a skull cap, he’s the Vicar of Christ, the Bishop of Rome, the SUCCESSOR to the Price of the Apostles, iiiiiiiIIIITS POPE LEO THE FOURTEENTH!!

      And in THIS CORNER, wearing a tailored suit and red tie, Couch fucker, white trash cosplayer and world’s worst negotiator, John Dilbert Vaaaaaaance!

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          5 days ago

          Had to look it up myself

          James David Vance (born James Donald Bowman

          Looks like he had him a gender-affirming name change.

      • dizzle18@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        This would be fantastic. We can even honor Leo’s Chicago roots by playing Alan Parsons Project during his intro.

      • Rooster326@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Pretty sure they would ring him up as the Undefeated Champion, The one, The only, Pope Killing, Couching Fucking Monster Jack Daniels… (What that’s not what it means?)…John Dilbert

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      I can respect debate but that’s not what happened here. This is a blasphemous tantrum. “I’m not wrong, God is.”

      You don’t get to join a cult then bitch you aren’t in charge.

    • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Sometimes I think that if there was an anti-Christ, they wouldn’t be aware that they were the anti-Christ. If that’s the case, JD Vance would be the perfect candidate.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    5 days ago

    The utter fucking nerve of these assholes.

    I’m not even a christian anymore, Catholic or otherwise. In fact I’ve long since gone full on athiest.

    But even I’M offended by this new level of horseshit by the Trump clown-show.

    • cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 days ago

      Right? I really dislike the catholic church and am an atheist myself, but these morons make the pope look like a reasonable statesman by comparison.

      • Vegafjord demcon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Curious how the framing makes something unreasonable become reasonable. Moving the conversation towards the unreasonable.

        • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          It doesn’t really; it’s hyperbole by comparison. The distance from my home to the moon is vast and unwalkable, but if you compared it to the distance between the earth and the center of the galaxy, someone might say it looks like a short walk in comparison.

          It obviously still is not possible, but it’s a way to stress how big the comparison is.

          • Vegafjord demcon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I think it would still apply to your scenario in the sense that if the public was genuinly talking about galactical travel, then traveling to the moon would seem like small potatoes in comparison.

            However, there are better examples to get the message accross.

            The message is:

            framing makes something unreasonable become reasonable

            Concider the following:

            • The war on drugs caused mass incarceration of blacks and hippies. The term makes us think that the mass incarceration is justified.

            • Pro life is a term used by conservatives who are against abortions causing the birth of unwanted children. Pro life makes us think that the birth of unwanted children is a matter of saving lives.

            • Reducing footprint is a campaign by exxon mobile to focus on pollution from consumers instead of producers. Fossil fuel companies gains more free passes, making the unreasonable pass more often.

            • Framing critics of Knesset regime as antisemites makes us dismiss the content of their criticism, making the unreasonable Knesset become reasonable.

            • By framing billionaires as intelligent, hard working and jobs creator, we make confiscation of societal goods sound reasonable.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 days ago

      I am with you. I don’t believe in what the Pope stands for but also recognize that he is not only the head of state of a foreign government, but the mouthpiece of a significant part of human tradition. This really is like the “fake news” arguments from Trump’s first campaign, i.e., “I don’t agree with what they say so I will attack them personally.”

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 days ago

        Theology might just be overly-specific literary study, but I can at least acknowledge when someone is a world-class expert on it.

  • matlag@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    5 days ago

    Look, they already decided they knew science better than scientists, they knew war better than military generals, they knew economy better than economists.

    Why did aynone think they would stop at theology?

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    5 days ago

    When Vance tells a Pope to be careful, that Pope should be careful. You know, considering Vance’s established track record with Popes…

          • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Queen Elizabeth was immortal right? Everyone knows that. But when Lizz Truss became prime minister, the queen was like “oh blimey, I believe it best that I take my departure from this unfortunate circumstance forthwith” which is translated to peasant English “screw this shit I’m outta here”. JD Vance is like a toddler Truss so if I were the pope, I’d kill myself too. I mean, you believe in God and an after life, you are the person standing between your imaginary world and reality for whoever believes in that shit. But after meeting this bozo you can’t believe in a god anymore, all hope is lost, fuck this world, it has no future. “Hoc nihil est; abeo.”

      • LostWon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 days ago

        Vance had a visit with the last pope at the Vatican, right before he died. At the time, Francis was trying to get him to acknowledge biblical teachings to love your neighbour (and I think that ICE was the antithesis of this), and not the vaguely dystopian stuff Vance was pushing about only only offering respect/kindness/compassion to the people closest to you.

  • BillCheddar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    If you’re not a Catholic, you might not understand how fucked up it is for Vance to stand there and call the Pope wrong about theology.

    By definition, the Pope is right about religion. If he changes his mind tomorrow, he was right then and he is right now.

    The equivalent would be if I became a Buddhist and then told the current Dalai Lama he was doing it wrong. Or maybe if I became a Hindu and then insisted that, actually, cheeseburgers are fuckin’ awesome.

    No joke, Vance is like two more dumbass statements away from being excommunicated.

      • Korkki@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s really the audacity that gets you. Also he talked shit about Francis too. He converted in 2019 and has second guessed 100% of the popes after his supposed conversion. Also with issue that are not even controversial. ‘War bad’ isn’t some radical catholic or even christian position.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          5 days ago

          Hell, his beef with Francis is even dumber. “Be good to refugees” is one of the most basic and consistent expectations placed on Christians. Jesus said to do it without room for interpretation, as does the old testament

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 days ago

        Catholics have the worst converts lol, they expect it to be a more aesthetic protestantism witn extra ritual, but then are shocked when they’re expected to listen to the magesterium and engage with theology in an educated manner without playing protestant calvinball, especially if they’re going to disagree with the magesterium