• csolisr@hub.azkware.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Including possession? What will they do, demand all users in the UK to unlock their devices for regular content scans?

  • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    6 days ago

    I may be stateside but i’m still amazed that a party that’s supposed to be truly left-leaning is putting out alt-right policies in the U.K.

  • MithranArkanere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    7 days ago

    As always, the first computers you should check when anyone tries to ban consensual porn that harms no one, are the computers of the ones proposing the ban.

  • GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    7 days ago

    The Ministry of Justice said that possessing and publishing porn showing incest between family members and sex between step or foster relatives where one person pretends to be under-18 would be a crime.

    So it’s only a crime if they pretend to be under-18, and I haven’t seen any porno where anyone pretends to be under-18. There’s literally a category called barely 18. No one ever pretends to be under, but they do pretend to be barely-18.

    Jess Asato, the Labour MP for Lowestoft, said: ‘After many years of campaigning to ensure online pornographic content is subject to the same rules as offline content,

    When the fuck was under-18 porn ever legal? WTF? Also, isn’t the age of consent in the UK 16 years old?

    What the fuck is the point of this? Why the fuck is it needed? Who is it helping? What is it fixing? NOTHING.

    Fucking jokers… Go tax the billionaires and fix the NHS and the cost of the living crisis you cunts .

  • Korne127@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 days ago

    Labour had a historical chance after the Tories have fucked it up so much, and they’re just doing shit all the time

    Hopefully the Green party can save UK

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    Step-incest pornography and that which depicts performers as children is abhorrent.
    Alongside banning strangulation in pornography which the government previously announced, tackling this vile content will make our country a safer place for women and children and shows the UK can lead the world in tackling violence against women and girls

    That’s it folks, step incest is violence against women and girls. Next up, in order to further protect them, they’ll be prohibited from going outside without a man by their side.

    Whoever asked “What’s next, BDSM?” - guess what

    The government has already made porn that shows women being choked illegal, after a review found videos like these had helped normalise it in real life.

    The only silver lining in this whole thing is still only in “planning”

    Ministers are also planning to make tech bosses personally liable if their platforms do not remove intimate pictures of people that are posted without consent.

  • Jollyllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is the hill they die on? This is the issue they threaten to revolt for? Not properly funding the NHS or something else that benefits people?

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    abhorrent step incest porn, sure ban it, but what about good or hot step incest porn? We all know what that is when we see it, right?

    And if they want to add a prison scene to the end of thos step incest porn films those pornos then fine. Sounds pervy to me, but I dont judge what other people do in their bedrooms alone that doesnt hurt anyone because thats none of my fucking business, or anyone elses. People (and governments) should just leave other people alone unless it directly affects others.

    Starmer seems like a moron with this move.