• w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    15 hours ago

    No, I think he’s saying if you can’t afford to live here, you should die.

  • pruwyben@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    14 hours ago

    “If you’re tired, if you’re poor, if you’re among the huddled masses yearning to breathe free, please get the fuck out of here.”

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It’s wild that the “land of the free, home of the brave” let a bunch of incel basement dwelling grifter losers take over and tank the nation.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If America has failed to provide paths to success for it’s own citizen, it’s because the very successful have destroyed those paths, not because Americans have failed. The end of this thinking is America is inhabited only by very rich people and slaves, regardless of whether they are citizens or not. This thinking will kick out the tired, the poor, the huddled American masses yearning to be free that it created. Shapiro and co are absolutely incapable of compassion or empathy except in their own self interest.

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Ben’s yarmulke game is on point like usual. Tiny, and the exact shade as his hair so that the anti-Semites in his target demographic won’t see it, but he’s still technically dressed the way his religion tells him to.

    He could of course, choose not to court the types of people that turn out to be antisemitic, but you know, that would involve not making everything worse.

    • dansemacabreingalone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I cut my teeth in left circles doing illegalist social work in a couple parts of northern california 15 or so years ago. Every experienced person who worked with unhoused populations knew theres a certain kind of people who get made victims at a shocking rate. Those really deranged out-there people usually with severe addictions who nobody would believe often had stories about police kidnapping them and holding them in foreclosures to torture them for a while, often with injuries to match. Everybody knew about the chicago pd making it formal with homan square and the various shit they get up to. Every department does it in their own way.

      Earlier this year i had to spend some time in los angeles without much to do. I decided to get a feel for the streets. I noticed three in one long day of layover, wandering the city. One eye and two fingers, taken relatively clean and cauterized. Each on a different person. Three in one day, just wandering around. Just me. None of them commented. All the injuries looked within the past couple days, still black on the edges with little red fissures. The one I asked looked scared, tried to talk about anything else. I didnt even have to wonder where they came from.

      Half of every municipal budget funds this. I don’t know what percentage of the fed budget goes to funding the exploding of schools, international torture prisons, and the suppression of renewable energy along with other fossil fuel subsidies.

      So what about that is fixable? The way they manage natural resources? Their vibrant healthy cultural practices? Their intellectual tradition? American cuisine? Their beautiful and unique architecture? You want to save america, what the fuck are you saving? Apple pie? The dutch do it better. Jazz? The best jazz musicians havent been from here since 1991; the soviet union still existed.

      The land; that stuff that votes? I guess thats pretty cool. Got some good nature left, but clock’s ticking on all that.

      Fuck america. Any dozen randon people who aren’t wholly owned could make something better.

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    They fucked up that country so bad, him and his allies, I kinda agree with him (it disgusts me to say that). You don’t want to go down with that sinking ship. Get the fuck out.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    146
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    For context, he was speaking about living in expensive metropolitan cities, suggesting people move into less expensive places within the US, like the interior states. Ben says enough stupid shit to mock without isolating a quote from context to make it seem like he said/meant something else entirely.

    Hell, there’s plenty to push back on with this quote and argument even understanding what he actually meant. “Just move somewhere cheaper”. Like that’s a much easier thing to say than do.

    1. If you’re unable to afford living where you are, then you’re probably going to struggle to afford the costs of moving. Then there’s the logistics of finding work and housing wherever you move to from another state. If you don’t have money to coast on for temporary housing, gas and food, you either need a company willing to hire you and provide you assistance to move or a personal connection in the area that’ll let you crash on their couch.

    2. Your field of work may just not exist in Guthrie, Oklahoma, or wherever. Leaving metro areas may mean changing careers. And those careers may not pay anywhere near as much either. Your costs may go down, but your wages might go with it.

    3. Leaving your home city means leaving all of your support structures. Your parents, siblings, friends, peers, etc. Some people may really depend on those. Or maybe someone depends on you specifically. Maybe your mom isn’t healthy? Maybe you have a sister dealing with addiction? Maybe they need your presence to ensure their care.

    4. There are political, legal, and health considerations in changing states. Do you have an active sex life and don’t want to be afraid that you’ll die from an unaborted ectopic pregnancy? Have a trans child? Are you not white? Then you may be more limited in suitable places to live outside of metropolitan city.

    5. This sidesteps the actual problem here, the why of it all. Why they can’t afford to live in the city they grew up in. Why is pay so bad? Why is housing so expensive? Why are groceries so expensive? But no, no. We can’t question or address those things. That’s just business baby. Free market capitalism at work. Let it ride, unregulated. Just move your ass out of the way to Hastings, Nebraska or some shit.

    • CH3DD4R_G0B-L1N@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Your comment is exactly why they say this type of thing and why it always works for them: they spit out a curt catchphrase/gotcha/“just asking questions” and to even begin to address the absurdity of it you need a bulleted list of all the ways it’s wrong. By then, even the non-red pilled person has moved on and lost interest before reading a rebuttal, but they remember the original talking point. It’s worked far too well for far too long.

      • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        It’s an aggressive mix of the gish gallop and motte and bailey fallacies.

        They won’t even own their own viewpoints once you’ve gone through the effort of pulling apart the claim and addressing it. They’ll tell you that you’re reading too deep into it, misinterpreting it, all while putting out more nonsense for you to address.

        There’s nothing you can do with the average person not being invested enough in politics to inquire further, and the lack of controls on public speakers. Except stoop to their level I suppose.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago
      1. It doesn’t scale. Where the problematic economic demographic is 50%+ percent of the pop and 70% live in cities no substantial portion effected could go live in all the Guthries in the nation. People are concentrated for reasons as old as civilization.
      2. It often wouldn’t help. Outside of shelter and taxes most goods don’t vary much or all by market and wages do.

      One could find yourself spending an overlarge portion of your money on rent in an urban market move for cheaper rent and find the difference in wages makes up the difference in rent and now you need to afford everything else on less total wages.

      1. Cheaper markets have worse services and safety nets. Those who already rely on good medial benefits in urban centers in blue states would find little savings in moving into the boondocks in their own states and would lose more in health care alone than they gain in rent moving to bumfuck
    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      20 hours ago

      So I will concede that he doesn’t give half a shit about 4, and thinks that people who have less rights in interior states shouldn’t have those rights anywhere. Furthermore I think he wants to separate the victims of his beliefs from ordinary working class people. Easier to hate a caricature of someone when they aren’t your neighbor.

      But I’ll add 2 more:

      1. The cost of living is going up in many previously cheap places now too. Some it’s not, my first apartment is apparently cheaper now than when I lived there, but it’s not a place many people are going to want to live. The nearest cities which are historically budget friendly cities on the other hand are no longer budget friendly. And no the places that are cheap aren’t scenic bumfuck nowhere, it’s small towns that aren’t pretty and don’t have much to do, even outdoors stuff.

      2. Cheaper places are increasingly non functional in basic governance and public services. Public transit? Yeah good fucking luck even in the cities people think should be fine. When you get to really small bumfuck nowhere you better hope you don’t need medicine fast, Benny boy helped ensure that the hospitals in those places shut down by fighting against Medicare and Medicaid. The water? Contaminated. What are you getting for your taxes? A bad school, a censored library, asshole cops who are bored when you’re coming home from the city, and not much else.

      Alternatively high cost of living areas are starting to engage in urbanist policies which will reduce the cost of living. Sure you won’t have a big yard in the city for cheap, but a reasonable sized apartment at a decent price or a reasonable priced house in the suburbs are possible.

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Yeah there is also the consideration that many that live in metro areas get by without a car, and are less likely to own a car or even have a driver’s license. Without reliable or even existent public transport in their new home, where a car is a basic necessity, that is another massive financial hurdle and even a skill/paperwork hurdle to make living there viable.

        • Art3mis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Im a city girlie and havent had a license in 5 years. Just havent really needed it. Whenever im going out of the city im either going with friends to the woods, so we carpool, or flying to another city, so i just use their pubtrans/rideshare

      • rozodru@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        bu-but the corporate landlords need money! won’t someone please think of those corporate blood sucking leaches!

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Counter to your point, i did leave my home city that was too expensive for me to live in. I did nearly become homeless before landing a job but once i landed a job i was able to afford a small house in a few years, a nearly impossible goal for me in my home town.

      I did have the benefit of my work skills are fairly universal and I could find some kind of employment nearly anywhere. If its an attainable goal to move, even if risky id say more often than not its worthwhile. It would be wise to do extensive research into average living costs and employment opportunities before moving.

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I certainly wasn’t saying that it isn’t a good option for some/most. It definitely can be. I’m saying that “just move” misses a lot of nuance, hurdles, pitfalls, and priorities. Like you said, you nearly ended up homeless. Even though you made it in the end, you were lucky you didn’t get stuck in that situation too.

        And that advice ignores the runaway problems that causes the affordability crisis in the first place, the same problems that are going to happen in places that are currently more affordable too. It is a short term solution for yourself to move. But when those problems catch up to you or your kids later, where are they going to go then? How long can the goal post keep moving before we stop it?

        • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          That could be part of your research process, by moving to city that is more walkable, pro-transit etc. Which i do know is easier said that done and often is more expensive.

          We do need collective action to make it better but the affordability crisis is incredibly complex and must be tackled from several factors ranging from car dependancy, city zoning, rent control policies, and several other factors. Most of what i mentioned is on the type and supply side, we also need to consider wage growth and job positions available. It becomes a complex mess with no 1 factor to blame.

          One of the most effective things you can do is vote locally for politicians that want beneficial change like density and transit, and not vote for the ones that do things like “even though this road is zoned for multi units and mid rises, im gonna fight every development that isn’t a SFH because it ruins the “character” of the neighborhood.”

    • athatet@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      This is a huge wall of text when all you need to say is that Ben Shapiro is a right wing grifter and nothing he says should be taken seriously.

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        It’s never for Ben himself, even if he did happen to somehow find this thread. He’s either a complete grifter that knows better or high on his own supply and has deluded himself about these things. Or both. Who it is for is the people that may see this as a “common sense” nugget of wisdom that may never examine it critically or those who are fed up with these over simplified “solutions” to their problems and just need to see that others aren’t taking this reversal of blame from systems and authority onto the individuals stuck under them without push back.

        It doesn’t feel wrong to come to the conclusion that “if things are too hard to get by here and they are easier over there, then you should go over there.” That sounds entirely reasonable, because if the problem were that simple, it would be. But the problem just isn’t that simple and pretending it is is the grift. That’s why folksy wisdom like this is so rarely related to reality. Life is layered and messy and complicated and FUCKING EXPENSIVE. No solution in the real world is simple, and even less so when you are broke.

    • thetentacle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      The right answer is to deconstruct the argument logically and educate, of course. But I think it has to be added that the hypocrisy is intentional and is not stupidity and to understand the argument behind the facade you have to understand us politics. Which is all about manipulating the voter turnout. Imigrants will, once naturalized, vote against republicans, so they are oppressed. Same with women, high education, and so on. These are all just traits that let you select people who’d vote against you.

      For example abortion, women who would consider aborition will statistically vote against republicans, so republicans rally around that and demonize abortion to make the women move away or stay away. Or as you mentioned transgender people, yes they can’t move to republican states, that’s the point!

      It’s always about supressing the people who statistically vote against you. In this case poor people vote against you, so you argue that poor people should leave the state or the country to dillute or strategically shift the voting opposition.

      • athatet@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The right answer is to laugh in their faces and make fun of them. People like Ben are not arguing in good faith. They do not care about logic and reason.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Alternative explanation: the “here” at the end is a misspeak and shouldn’t be there. He’s advocating killing poor and homeless people which is in line with current republican policy.

    • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Well… ok… I guess if we are going to die by the millions then we should… I dont know… die doing something… what ever that is…

    • LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, because if you can’t afford to live, then you certainly can’t afford to move to another country.

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not sure if this is a jest, but it isn’t true.

        People move to other countries sometimes with little more than the clothes on their backs - just look at historical immigration to the US.

        If you have the luxury of doing it the proper way - getting a job offer, a place to live, etc - then that’s perfect, but desperate people will do desperate things to survive.

        • hoppolito@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          1 day ago

          I may be misunderstanding your argument but just to make sure I want to point out that

          desperate people will do desperate things to survive

          does not run counter to

          if you can’t afford to live, then you certainly can’t afford to move to another country

        • [deleted]@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          The vast majority of the people who live to tell that story had family support from back home an connections before they loved, just like the ‘self made millionaires’ who started their company in their parents three car garage with hundreds of thousands of dollars invested by family members.

          Otherwise it is mostly poor people who are getting trafficked if they o ly have the shirts on their backs because the smugglers stole the meager amount they had saved up.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Then they should stop trying to fight abortions! We’reTRYING to shrink the unwanted populations, but we’re getting stuck with these unwanted kids.