mostly inactive, lemmy.ca is now too tainted with trolls from big instances we’re not willing to defederate
but you think it righteous to punish someone for a wrong answer?
Why do you believe this is what’s happening? What parts of what this guy had as evidence against him that you think should get protected as free speech? Quote something specific that was raised as evidence
He did me one better. His hard work paid for some financial literacy so I’m grateful
Owning a home is the best investment you’ll make in your life.
Sure grandpa, let’s take you to bed
Convince you of what makes sense? You seem to think Mr Neufeld was fined for saying “there are two genders” but that’s not what he said.
Do you know the statements that made evidence for the trial in the first place, before asking for being convinced of anything?
Edit:
ask anyone off the street and you’ll get a random number
this is a like asking how many colors are there in the rainbow. Most people will name 5 to 7 colors, but the answer is “all visible colors, which is a spectrum and not a set amount; the fact that we usually name the common ones doesn’t mean we there exists 7 colors only”. The reason this question doesn’t have a right answer isn’t that “we can’t agree on it”; everyone who understands gender agrees the question itself is wrong because it starts from bad assumptions.
and I hope Im not fined for saying so.
lol poor soul, must be so hard living under the threat of persecution!!
But I do understand the tradition of not voting down on first reading.
Tradition shouldn’t come before a basic filter for platforming hate
You are being really stubborn about accepting that gender has a proper and scientific view, probably because the scientific consensus is not saying what you think it should be saying