Pistachios are native to Iran, and until the 1970s Iran was the world’s largest exporter. They dyed their exports with a food safe red.
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
chaogomu@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•English Wikipedia bans archive.todayEnglish
2·19 hours agoAutomation won’t do it right. And that’s the goal.
Besides, Wikipedia has always been human written for humans. Or at least, that too is the goal.
chaogomu@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•English Wikipedia bans archive.todayEnglish
12·23 hours agoAltering the content of the archive certainly is different. And is undeniably worse.
chaogomu@lemmy.worldto
politics @lemmy.world•FCC chair Brendan Carr claims media were ‘lied to’ over Stephen Colbert controversyEnglish
5·2 days agoBari Weiss is the appointed censor at the network.
It’s just that Colbert has an iron clad contract, so they have to let him ride it out. That doesn’t mean that they won’t fuck with him.
https://www.reinhartlaw.com/news-insights/only-humans-can-be-authors-of-copyrightable-works
https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/chap300/ch300-copyrightable-authorship.pdf
A human must be involved in the creation. A human can combine non-human created things to make something new, but the human must be involved, and the non-human created elements likely lack protection themselves.
The law is very clear that non-human generated content cannot hold copyright.
That monkey that took a picture of itself is a famous example.
But yes, the OP is missing some context. If a human was involved, say in editing the code, then that edited code can be subject to copyright. The unedited code likely cannot.
Human written code cannot be stripped of copyright protection regardless of how much AI garbage you shove in.
Still, all of this is meaningless until a few court cases happen.


The real answer is that yes, they were red, but no it wasn’t because they were poor quality.
It’s because the world’s largest exporter was Iran, and Iran had a blanket policy of dying their pistachios red.