• I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    If only real life AI was anything close to sci-fi AI. We expected cold, calculating computer psychopaths and we got overly enthusiastic yes men that get in a ditz if you ask it about non-existent emojis

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    To me, it’s like GMOs.

    I trust the science behind GMOs. They work, and we can do amazing things with that technology.

    I don’t trust the profit seeking corporations that are selling the stuff to me. Doesn’t matter what the technology is, Monsanto is gonna do Monstanto shit.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Makes it even more frustrating when you hear the anti-GMO people talk about why they’re against it. Always completely irrational.

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Honestly same.

    I always got excited about early AI use because it was actually innovative.

    Like using AI to get better HDR photos, using AI for object recognition and Augmented Reality.

    I was sure I’d always be an early adopter for it all.

    Then within a day of ChatGPTs release, I saw the same social patterns as NFTs forming. I was like “this stupid chat bot fad will die out quickly, it’s all slop frontends for the same chat bot”.

    I even made a point to differentiate LLMs from AI, because AI used to label something innovative.

    And now I’m here vehemently avoiding LLMs. Cringing whenever I hear AI tacked on to a product name. Getting suspicious whenever I hear the word.

    • Cyv_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah this is where I’m at. Actual movie level AI would be neat, but what we have right now is closer to a McDonald’s toy pretending to be AI than the real deal.

      I’d be overjoyed if we had decently functional AI that could be trusted to do the kind of jobs humans don’t want to do, but instead we have hyped up autocomplete that’s too stupid to reliably trust to run anything (see the shitshow of openclaw when they do).

      There are places where machine learning has and will continue to push real progress but this whole “AI is on the road to AGI and then we’ll never work again” bullshit is so destructive.

      • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        What we have now is “neat.” It’s freaking amazing it can do what it does. However it is not the AI from science fiction.

        • ageedizzle@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I think this is what causes this divide between the AI lovers and haters. What we have now is genuinely impressive even if largely nonfunctional. Its a confusing juxtaposition

          • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            Folks don’t seem to realize what LLMs are, if they did then they wouldn’t be wasting trillions trying to stuff them in everything.

            Like, yes, it is a minor technological miracle that we can build these massively-multidimensional maps of human language use and use them to chart human-like vectors through language space that remain coherent for tens of thousands of tokens, but there’s no way you can chain these stochastic parrots together to get around the fact that a computer cannot be held responsible, algorithms have no agency no matter how much you call them “agents”, and the people who let chatbots make decisions must ultimately be culpable for them.

            It’s not “AI”, it’s a n-th dimensional globe and the ruler we use to draw lines on that globe. Like all globes, it is at best a useful fiction representing a limited perspective on a much wider world.