You’re not productive if you don’t use a lot of AI, says guy who makes all of his money selling AI hardware

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s moments like these that make me think about the state of the world and my part in it. I may just be a random loser on the Internet, but I do know a lot more shit that some of the biggest multi-quad-spillion-dollar CEOs, apparently.

    For example, it’s an old fact that tech CEOs know jack shit about measuring productivity, even when they’re obsessed with it. Yeah. One more example.

  • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    7 days ago

    It would take a great burden from my shoulders, if AI could wash my clothes, do the dishes, cook, and vacuum my apartment. Those are the things I don’t want to do. I like my job. I can do it myself. Yeah, sure, there are occasionally things that AI can do for me in my daily work, but it’s mostly stupid, repetitive shit. And then I have to review it, which sucks even harder.

    • worhui@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      So I found it kind of sucks to have those daily life tasks removed. I worked in a place early in my career that had on site catered food, on site laundry, on site massage, shopping services (before Amazon prime) and lodging for excessive overtime .

      If it’s just leaving you more opportunity to work it sucks. I can’t be the only one who enjoys taking care of the daily life tasks Lê cleaning, shopping and cooking for myself. It’s what personalizes your life. When you do it for yourself, you decide what you eat and what you wear.

      It seems cool but it’s offered so you never stop working and your life is never really your own.

  • moustachio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s amazing they can just make these claims without literally any evidence and no major “media” organization asks for it. They are just propaganda for these companies.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    7 days ago

    CEO suggests raising employee costs by fifty percent and is immediately fired.

    Sorry, we don’t live in a sane world anymore.

  • nightchrome@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    7 days ago

    They’ve all realized there’s no point in even bothering to hide the grift anymore. People don’t care.

  • filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    The beauty is when those companies run out of human training data and start training on AI slop, just to generate even more AI slop.

    This is probably already happening though.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

    Let me translate this for you, “My bonus depends on you showing our massive investment wasn’t a waste so I’m holding your jobs hostage until you make up busy work to pretend it was worthwhile.”

  • answersplease77@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    The AI bubble went from a trillion dollar worth of circlejerk investments, to a self-sucking circlejerk trillion dollar ponzi scheme. Jensen Huang is right the moment an Invidia’s employee stop sucking their own dick or stop jerking off their coworkers and bosses simultaneously, the whole economy collapse.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    7 days ago

    Sam Altman floated paying employees in chatGPT tokens, that surely their landlord will accept. The main motive would be being broke. Nvidia is not broke, but it is weird as fuck to be comparing it to salary, if it doesn’t segue into the OpenAI plan. The $500k salary example would seem to generate more tokens than you could have time to skim over in review.

  • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I thought AI would save us money? If it adds 50% onto the cost of a salary and bynall studies does not improve productivity output, then it’s not great.

    • percent@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      This may sound weird, but I think anecdotal evidence might be more informative than the productivity stats for now, until the industry settles on a new equilibrium.

      Some engineers are more productive with AI, and some (maybe even most, still) are less productive. People are still putting in the effort to learn how to use it more effectively/productively (there is a learning curve), and some of the less productive are getting laid off.

      It sucks, but that’s just how it is now.

      Also, AI tooling is still evolving very rapidly. A lot of information and stats are only valid for maybe a few months.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    Jesus that’s a lot of tokens.

    Even if I was trying to do everything in my power to make burn tokens for real work I’d be hard fucking pressed to burn more than a couple thousand a month and that’s just being wasteful.

    • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      you just need to use more context injection and more agents working in parallel on git worktrees or whatever and then get really depressed because you own an absolute fuckload of code now and you are less familiar with it

  • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    I remember back when Nvidias PR team used to push this humble rags to riches story about Jensen back in the day, I guess even they would have a tough time doing that now that he’s gone mask off