The simple math of the Yard-Sale Model shows that if everybody started out with equal money in a fair economy, the outcome tends toward one person holding all of the money. The cool graphical simulations on this page demonstrate why.

  • bearboiblake@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’ll share this here - my explanation of why capitalism inevitably leads to fascism

    I’m afraid that it is absolutely inevitable - let me explain why

    Basically, the issue with capitalism is that the more wealth you have, the easier it is for you to make more money. And since money can be used to buy goods, services and influence, there is always a way to use money to gain more political and social power. With that political and social power, you can push society and the legal system in the direction you want to go. So you can use your wealth to gain power, and then you can use your power to change laws and society so that you can make even more wealth and power. It’s a positive feedback loop.

    Obviously, though, if the billionaires and ruling class are accumulating more and more of our society’s wealth, that inevitably means that there’s less for everyone else to go around - therefore, working class people feel poorer and poorer. Meanwhile, the economy is going absolutely great for rich people, so inflation continues to go up - everything gets more expensive, but wages don’t increase. The wealthy just keep more and more of the wealth for themselves. To accumulate more and more wealth, they change the laws so that they can avoid paying taxes, so public services collapse. Politicians are lobbied to ensure that public funds are diverted away from where it is most needed - housing, healthcare, transportation, infrastructure - and instead into industries where their class interests most benefit from it, such as weapons manufacturing and extractive industries such as fossil fuels and mining.

    The working class are bound to notice that their lives are getting shittier and shittier, and if that situation is left unchecked, the working class would realize that the ruling class are fucking them over, rise up, and overthrow their rulers. Obviously, the ruling class need to do something about this, but there’s no solution that the ruling class can offer. They’re causing all of the problems, to fix them they’d have to give up some of their wealth and power - and that’s not something they’re going to do. So they need to find someone else to blame the problems we have in society on. Unfortunately, though, no matter who they blame the problems on, and no matter what they do to “fix” it, the issue will continue to persist, because the material conditions underlying the issues are, very intentionally, never addressed.

    So, the conundrum returns: The ruling class said that minority A caused all of the problems, minority A is persecuted and oppressed, but society doesn’t actually get any better. Either the problem wasn’t minority A, or minority A just hasn’t been oppressed enough yet. So the ruling class can either escalate the oppression, or they can shift the focus to another minority group. The division continues to escalate in terms of how vitriolic and extreme it is, and it also continues to divide the working class into smaller and smaller groups.

    To get the working class to buy into this hateful message, they need to take advantage of our worst instincts, and one of those instincts is the in-group bias. The majority are manipulated into being suspicious, then intolerant, then hateful, then violent, then genocidal, towards whatever the targeted minority of the day is. Anything that can be used to divide the working class - sexuality, nationality, immigration status, ethnicity, religion, sex, gender identity, age, all of these will be used as wedges to keep the working class split apart and not working together, because they know that if the working class actually unite against them, they are completely and truly fucked.

    That’s exactly how fascism manifests. It’s because it’s possible for people to accumulate power through wealth. This is why capitalism must be abolished. If we do not abolish capitalism, fascism will always return. It’s just a matter of time.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Capitalism is working exactly as intended, which is the reason why it needs to be totally dismantled.

    Note: I said capitalism, and not the free market. The two are not the same thing. You could have a completely free market under socialism and even communism, as those are economic systems that ensure workers actually earn the value they produce. Neither system says anything about command economies - that’s an Authoritarian shtick.

    • valgarf@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      The title of the post is a little misleading. The model presented here does not require many parts of a capitalist system. If you can own stuff and have a free market this model predicts extreme wealth inequality. This happens by pure chance.

      The model is not a good argument against capitalism. It can be used as an argument for taxing rich folks and against the “trickle down” idea.

  • melfie@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hard work does not create wealth. The only thing that creates wealth is wealth, and we have it, and you don’t.

    This quote from Horrible Bosses 2 always stood out to me.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    In light of the pedofile parasite class raping and killing children and funneling all of our money to Israel I think it’s pretty obvious that the system needs to come down

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Winning 60% of the rounds, and you still haven’t more money than the player who started with more. Is that not proof of the concept?

      Also, yes, this game tickles in a good way.

  • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    In this thread: I don’t like this article and it’s stupid. I can’t tell you why, but it is, and anyone that disagrees with me is stupid too.

    QED

  • TheFogan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    2 days ago

    Another simulation… that’s mainstream in american society… Landlords Game – IE what’s now Monopoly. By definition everyone starts with the same amount of money, and it ends with one person massively ahead and everyone else going bankrupt.

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well yes, but have you tried just throwing the board across the room when that one person gets massively ahead and you land on Pacific avenue with a hotel on it?

      • TheFogan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        True, but the point of the simulations is basically debunking the idea that even when capitalism “works”. IE the hypothetical perfect scenereo where everyone starts off with the same, has the same chances of getting good and bad opprotunities, that the the fairness systematically fades out of the system the longer the game runs.

        I recall an economics class once where they started out playing monopoly, but giving everyone different starting amounts of money… and basically demonstrating that well over 90% of the time… the advantages basically determined the game.

        Realistically the everyone starts at a different value, is far more realistic to life… but even when you remove that realism, it still ends the same way, one person starts taking a lead… and that that inequality only grows the longer the game continues.

  • oyzmo@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yup! That is why salary increase always is in percentage; the more you have, the more you get! 😡

  • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yard-Sale model also explains the Network Effect: People will flock to where the masses are because they will have a higher access to interact with folks than in isolated networks. Thus silos will eventually emerge: See Meta+Discord, etc…

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes, if you make your economy “people with money gain more money” then this is the endgame

    • OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’ve demonstrated exactly how the system works. Statistically a few players will be lucky and become very rich. They’ll be looked at as “built different”. All the other poor players will try to emulate them as if they can beat the system by achieving some virtue like working hard enough or having innate skill rather than realize the system is mathematically impossible to beat.