Still false, you own the token representing the monkey but not the monkey itself
The correct understanding of NFTs has always been trivial: they’re certificates. What they certify is not determined.
Anyone telling you anything else is either lying, or a moron (or has been lied to, which is not incompatible with being a moron).
Yuppp
The anti-NFT crowd won with lies, helped by the loudest pro-NFT voices also being absolute morons and focusing on the dumbest possible ways to actually implement it.
Let it go man, the NFTs aren’t coming back.
Good ideas never die ;)
To be clear I didn’t get into “NFTs” during the craze at all because I knew what NFTs are supposed to be and personalized pictures of monkeys is not it.
At the same time it was hilarious how stupid the arguments on both sides were.
Isn’t it basically just a receipt?
Provenance is a major issue in art. NFTs provide the best provenance yet.
It’s more general than that; a receipt is like a certificate that certifies that you bought something, but an NFT could certify something else.
I wonder about the source of this image. She looks horribly uncomfortable…
They are actors playing wrestling in a scripted reality series
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/john-silver-explaining-to-anna-jay
It looks set up unlike the original.
This is why I like the other one because the bro being explained to just looks like his soul is dying.
