First off…there’s various iterations of Superwoman. Whether she’s wearing a short skirt or barely covering her nipples…the difference is a little more obvious than some weird generic hero.
But having tight clothes showing off ideal muscles isn’t the same level of sexualization as having tight clothes showing off a models body and skin.
First off…there’s various iterations of Superwoman. Whether she’s wearing a short skirt or barely covering her nipples…the difference is a little more obvious than some weird generic hero.
But having tight clothes showing off ideal muscles isn’t the same level of sexualization as having tight clothes showing off a models body and skin.
Like this?
Comic book women are for straight men, and comic book men are for gay men (and the gayness within us all).
If comics were written for women they wouldn’t resemble any of this bullshit.
Uh huh… Even threw in some vintage books in there.
How different are they?
Women advertise themselves having big boobs, promising enough breast milk to offsprings so that more men will accept them as partners.
Men advertise themselves having great strength thus having better protection over women and their offsprings when predators come.
Suck it up. If not for our own lust, it’s just animal nature to select partners. Stop the moral standard or social etiquette bullshit.
Umm…no. Sounds like you went to the Jordan Peterson school of anthropology.
Suck it up? No thanks. I live in society that sexualizes teenaged girls and I’ll never accept it…glad you feel like it’s ok to be a bully again.