A better choice in art would have been comparing spider woman and spider man, as they both do the same poses and have more similar costumes.
First off…there’s various iterations of Superwoman. Whether she’s wearing a short skirt or barely covering her nipples…the difference is a little more obvious than some weird generic hero.
But having tight clothes showing off ideal muscles isn’t the same level of sexualization as having tight clothes showing off a models body and skin.
Like this?
Comic book women are for straight men, and comic book men are for gay men (and the gayness within us all).
If comics were written for women they wouldn’t resemble any of this bullshit.
If comics were written for women they wouldn’t resemble any of this bullshit.
Uh huh… Even threw in some vintage books in there.
How different are they?
Women advertise themselves having big boobs, promising enough breast milk to offsprings so that more men will accept them as partners.
Men advertise themselves having great strength thus having better protection over women and their offsprings when predators come.
Suck it up. If not for our own lust, it’s just animal nature to select partners. Stop the moral standard or social etiquette bullshit.
Umm…no. Sounds like you went to the Jordan Peterson school of anthropology.
Suck it up? No thanks. I live in society that sexualizes teenaged girls and I’ll never accept it…glad you feel like it’s ok to be a bully again.
for this to be accurate superman would need a ball window
we can only hope
Except aren’t both of male fantasies of the two genders?
Its my favorite fact that absolutely no woman has ever fantasized about the hyper muscular super hero bods.
And in fact, I had no idea this comic artist was a man until this moment lol
I agree with the sentiment but “Absolutely no woman has ever fantasized” about that?
Do you really believe that? If not, why use these words? I don’t think it serves your purpose and it’s too bad.
Don’t hate me please. I’m just talking semantics which are important to me
