• hope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      It has a 60Hz electric waveform in, and it produces visible light, which is in part a ~500THz wave.

      • sik0fewl@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Do you think we will ever change our power grid to have a higher frequency so that our bulbs don’t flicker when we record things?

        • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          High frequency is generally bad for transmission line losses, so getting power from A to B is better at lower frequency — DC is a great option here.

          If we switched to DC, many things would still flicker though as they would presumably use switching power supplies, but those could be relatively high frequency like you said.

          Interestingly, airplanes use 400Hz, as transmission over distance doesn’t matter, and transformers can be made much smaller/lighter.

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            21 days ago

            Also if we switched to DC, you’d need costly dcdc transformers to step up the voltage for transmission and back down again for domestic usage

              • FishFace@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 days ago

                As far as I understand, a DCDC converter is less efficient and more expensive than an equivalent ACAC converter. I don’t know about switching power supplies, and whether that’s true or extendable to the transformer case, sorry.

                Long distance point to point power transmission (like internationally) is often DC because transmission losses become more important.