• hope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    It has a 60Hz electric waveform in, and it produces visible light, which is in part a ~500THz wave.

    • sik0fewl@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Do you think we will ever change our power grid to have a higher frequency so that our bulbs don’t flicker when we record things?

      • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        High frequency is generally bad for transmission line losses, so getting power from A to B is better at lower frequency — DC is a great option here.

        If we switched to DC, many things would still flicker though as they would presumably use switching power supplies, but those could be relatively high frequency like you said.

        Interestingly, airplanes use 400Hz, as transmission over distance doesn’t matter, and transformers can be made much smaller/lighter.

        • FishFace@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Also if we switched to DC, you’d need costly dcdc transformers to step up the voltage for transmission and back down again for domestic usage

            • FishFace@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              24 days ago

              As far as I understand, a DCDC converter is less efficient and more expensive than an equivalent ACAC converter. I don’t know about switching power supplies, and whether that’s true or extendable to the transformer case, sorry.

              Long distance point to point power transmission (like internationally) is often DC because transmission losses become more important.