• VeryFrugal@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      92·
      2 days ago

      Higher access to vagina

      Access to new and improved body parts

      Unlimited access to conversation*

      * Restrictions per Terms and Services apply

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        110·
        2 days ago

        Higher access to vagina

        My guy if you want higher access into the vagina, that’s on you, grow a longer dick

        Unlimited access to conversation*

        That comes as part of the base plan. “Access to limiting conversation” would be the subscription bonus

          • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
            15·
            2 days ago

            Are you married? Do you understand the compromises and social management that goes into making a marriage with kids work?

              • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
                12·
                2 days ago

                OK, so you do understand that sometimes one ends up being in an emotionally support role by default, leading to many conversations where you’re assisting the person and sometimes it gets draining. Which is why “unlimited conversation” wouldn’t be in the higher tier, since it doesn’t specify the nature of the conversation.

                Also, I tried to call it out, because there was a thread where some asshole was trying to imply you should feed babies and toddlers (0-3 year olds) vegan diets, they had nothing to do with having their own kids.

                https://lemmy.world/post/41808560/21667181

  • tal@lemmy.todayEnglish
    9·
    3 days ago

    Given that there are fixed costs associated setting up a WaaS setup that would be inefficient to do on a case-by-case basis, this seems like a prime opportunity for franchising.

  • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
    93·
    3 days ago

    Honestly, this exact scenario playing out with AI lovers of both anatomies and getting bad-enough that people decide learning to understand and put up with eachother’s non-sense is the better option … is the best chance our species has in this and future generations.

    Otoh, we all know its mostly men, and this represents maybe a bottleneck we need to weed-out the ones that will never get the lesson. Here’s hoping there’s enough genetics in it at-play to actually eliminate a substantnal amount of the right(very specific levels/attributes of NP, gullibility and psychopathy) things, and not pointlessly cost our species a bunch of genetic diversity that could otherwise hang-around.

    If that second paragraph seems harsh/eugenic, understand its the only potential possitive I see along this path, and almost certainly accidental if it works-out that way in the end at all. I believe anyone trying to make such happen on-purpose is insane and a bad person, promise.

    More likely, our grand-kids will all be fucking robots until they die, and “their” kids won’t be so-much theirs as clones/test-tube-babies the robots raise, should they for some absurd reason deign to keep flesh-bags around at all.

    • MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world
      2·
      2 days ago

      Doesn’t even have to be genetic, could be a matter of nurture as well (yes, I am well aware that this is not guaranteed either).

      As for the robots scenario, I’d imagine the robots would be programmed/trained/prompted to act like Stepford spouses or something, so perhaps they’d keep the children around purely because that’s what they do.