MTZ@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agoRough time to be a woman. ☕lemmy.worldimagemessage-square60linkfedilinkarrow-up11.01Karrow-down110
arrow-up11Karrow-down1imageRough time to be a woman. ☕lemmy.worldMTZ@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square60linkfedilink
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up67·2 days agoOr just the four of them together in one go I guess.
minus-squarehomes@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up51·2 days agoRegardless of which way it happened, I’d be crying a lot, especially if it happened in the 1800s.
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·2 days agoIn the 1800s you’d be counting yourself lucky you survived it.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·2 days agoFood was much cheaper and you were allowed to put them to work right away. Plus most of them died before five anyways.
minus-squarehomes@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·2 days agoAh, yes, the 1800s… When it was perfectly legal to put newborn babies to work in the coal-mining sweat shops of South London Very Tiny Tim: Please, Sir, may I have some WHAAAAA! WHAAAA! WHAAAAA!
minus-squareVelma@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 days agoKids as young as 4 years old would be put to work, so it’s not that far off really.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·2 days agoNot just legal but encouraged.
minus-squarehomes@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoEncouraged by all the starvation, poverty, and pestilence
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoI think it reminds them of the womb.
minus-squarepruwyben@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoOr octuplets born on new year’s eve so half were in one year and half were in the next.
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·2 days agoNow we’re going into bitch territory. 🐕
minus-squareTheTechnician27@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 days agoOr triplets in January and one in November, or one in January and triplets in November (but it was definitely these two months). She’s crazy – capable of anything.
minus-squareMac@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoI knew a set of quads in school. They were all really cool.
minus-squareMac@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·19 hours agoWell, i didn’t examine their DNA lol but they all presented the same gender and were visually similar to each other.
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 hours agoSounds like identical then I guess. Pretty wild!
Or just the four of them together in one go I guess.
Regardless of which way it happened, I’d be crying a lot, especially if it happened in the 1800s.
In the 1800s you’d be counting yourself lucky you survived it.
Food was much cheaper and you were allowed to put them to work right away.
Plus most of them died before five anyways.
Ah, yes, the 1800s… When it was perfectly legal to put newborn babies to work in the coal-mining sweat shops of South London
Very Tiny Tim: Please, Sir, may I have some WHAAAAA! WHAAAA! WHAAAAA!
Kids as young as 4 years old would be put to work, so it’s not that far off really.
Not just legal but encouraged.
Encouraged by all the starvation, poverty, and pestilence
They yearn for the mines after all
I think it reminds them of the womb.
Or 6 at once but 2 didn’t make it
Or octuplets born on new year’s eve so half were in one year and half were in the next.
Now we’re going into bitch territory. 🐕
Or triplets in January and one in November, or one in January and triplets in November (but it was definitely these two months). She’s crazy – capable of anything.
I knew a set of quads in school. They were all really cool.
Nice! Identical or fraternal?
Well, i didn’t examine their DNA lol but they all presented the same gender and were visually similar to each other.
Sounds like identical then I guess. Pretty wild!