masterofn001

The simplest solution seems to be to detach CEO’s from their internal organs.

A conspiracy of global elites? Pffft.

That’s crazytalk.

It’s not like Peter Thiel ,one time president and current member of the BILDERBERG steering committee , and a bunch of other dudes who worked at PayPal are solely responsible for the trajectory of technology…

Or like some forum on economics somewhere in the world would coordinate economics, and make some crazy plan with a super unbelievably literal name like agenda 2030 with the dude at the head saying “you’ll own nothing and you will be happy”

I mean… Crazy. Right.

The rich should have already been filleted and cooked.

Peter thiel is everything wrong with the world.

He is a plague, a cancer, a curse.

He is in the Epstein files.

He likely had his gay lover killed for revealing he was gay.

Peter thiel is the enemy of humanity.

Peter thiel is an antichrist

I agree that it should be able to infer the intent, but I stand by that it remain somewhat unclear and open to interpretation. Eg, If such language was used in a legal contract, it would not be enough to simply say, well, they should understand what I meant.

The people doing this test, I’m sure, are not linguistic masters, nor legal scholars.

There are lines of work where clarity is essential.

And what if my question actually was asking, should I just go for a walk instead of driving that far?

I know the answer. But as 30% demonstrated, clarity IS needed.

Understanding the intent of the question *and understanding why it could be interpreted differently *\and understanding why is it is a poorly phrased question:

There are 3 sentences.

I want to wash my car. No location or method is specified. No ‘at the car wash’. No ‘take my car to the car wash’ . No ‘take the car through the car wash’

A car wash is this far. Is this an option? A question. A suggestion. A demand?

Should I walk or drive? To do what? Wash the car? Ok. If the car wash is an option, that seems very far. But walking there seems silly. Since no method or location for washing the car was mentioned I could wash my own car.

Do you see how this works?

Yes, you can infer what was implied, but the question itself offers no certainty that what you infer is what it is actually implying.

Understanding the intent of the question *and understanding why it could be interpreted differently *\and understanding why is it is a poorly phrased question are not related to autism. (In my case)

I want to wash my car. No location or method is specified. No ‘at the car wash’. No ‘take my car to the car wash’ . No ‘take the car through the car wash’

A car wash is this far. Is this an option? A question. A suggestion. A demand?

Should I walk or drive? To do what? Wash the car? Ok. If the car wash is an option, that seems very far. But walking there seems silly. Since no method or location for washing the car was mentioned I could wash my own car.

Do you see how this works?

Yes, you can infer what was implied, but the question itself offers no certainty that what you infer is what it is actually implying.

Without reading the article, the title just says wash the car.

I could go for a walk and wash my car in my driveway.

Reading the article… That is exactly the question asked. It is a very ambiguous question.

*I do understand the intent of the question, but it could be phrased more clearly.

You know, it wasn’t always like this

Not very long ago, just before your time
Right before the towers fell, circa '99
This was catalogs, travel blogs, a chatroom or two
We set our sights and spent our nights waiting
For you, you, insatiable you
Mommy let you use her iPad, you were barely two
And it did all the things we designed it to do
Now, look at you, oh, ha, look at you
You, you, unstoppable, watchable
Your time is now, your inside’s out, honey, how you grew
And if we stick together, who knows what we’ll do?
It was always the plan
to put the world in your hand

~ Bo Burnham

Welcome to the Internet

Hardware will be available, silly. ^†

You will have the “freedom” ^‡ to choose from the hardware vendor* you want. Like always! ^‡‡

^{† For $49.95 per month.}

^Terms and conditions and government social score apply.^

^‡‡ ^Authorized and approved by the department of national security and intelligence gathering agencies and the billionaire technofascist bros clubh^

Try selling/saying/teaching/thinking something pro Palestine in the united states (are they even a real country when it’s just a bunch of gay states in a civil union?) and see what happens.

First step is destroying their tech infrastructure and capabilities.

The power they have with the data they have with the force available - it absolutely must be destroyed.

Without that at their advantage,we’re almost on a level playing field.