

That a system supports a life you find worthwhile does not mean it is inherently worth supporting.
That’s not the claim made in op. Op makes exactly 0 claims on what kind of life one SHOULD think is worthwhile, or what kind of system SHOULD be. The point is that it’s on the reader to figure out for themselves. Again, you input your own values into the framework.
You define what kind of life is worthwhile.
You support a system that you KNOW enables it.
It would NOT make sense to NOT support a system that enables it.


If you value some relationship (for whatever reason, be it work, family or communal), you only need to put up with difficult people as much as the valued relationship requires you to.
As in, there’s no “objective” amount of how much you need to put up with difficult people. It’s defined by people you already have around you. If people around you demand that you have to spend time and energy on a difficult person way more than you want, it’s on you to figure out if those people are worth it.