Yes. California AG

Update: serverHold status has been removed from t.me after Telegram removed the sanctioned company’s channel. t.me links are all working now.

+1

But the unfortunate truth is, who will oversee that it’s being followed. Time and time again has shown that these agencies have different power on paper and unofficially…take the NSA or the CIA or literally any intelligence agency around the world and you’ll find the same pattern

Yup. IdentityDigital has confirmed its due to OFAC compliance. Presumably due to telegram not complying with the takedown order of the channel, registry (IdentityDigital) Was forced to suspend the entire t.me domain for compliance

Linddun is basically 7 parameters for privacy. Yes a bit less known true

Update: A few provisions of chat control 1.0 has unfortunately passed today along with amendments to two provisions. Details: https://thecybersecguru.com/news/eu-chat-control-2026-guide/

New update: The expedited procedure has been approved, and a subsequent vote on Chat Control 1.0 is scheduled for this Thursday.

The vote tallies were as follows:

For: 331

Against: 304

Abstentions: 11

Yup just a PSA to get patched asap

Same. Duck.com is blocked for a lot of sites. Many block it

Yes but they take a lill time

Also, one should not depend on the version of nginx that ships with any particular distro…auch as ubuntu and all cuz generally, they are not the latest versions…best is to simply grab nginx or any package directly from their own repo which will ensure that one always gets the latest version…but again that’s a double edged sword…

Update: seems like there’s a 2nd wave of attack…a bit more sophisticated than the initial wave…has begun. Code is more obfuscated

On the internet every company does User profiling mainly for advert purposes…its impossible to escape these days but what’s most concerning about glasses was face data was pretty easily made available by the user…still advert and tracking cookies can be blocked…but meta glass camera? Which is basically one of its most highpoint feature? I doubt anyone will heights to block it physically considering that they cost an arm and a leg

Wait…does this mean every time someone wearing a meta glass looked at me…rather its camera looked at me, meta stored my face for profiling purposes regardless of me being an user of meta Apps or not?? This is so messed up. Initially I thought that only friends of meta users used to get profiled via face recognition…wtf…but again it’s meta…violated multiple privacy laws and as such…so not a surprise tbh