

I think you have missed the mark with this. It doesn’t make sense logically, and seems more like an emotional (understandably so) response.


I think you have missed the mark with this. It doesn’t make sense logically, and seems more like an emotional (understandably so) response.


I’m not sure that’s true.
Let’s realistically entertain your point: You say he should sell his assets to get money, so he can give it to the poor, basically (correct me if I’m wrong).
The yacht and other stuff, probably bought with a loan, insured by Steam’s value. His real assets is, like, Steam.
I don’t know if you already see where this is going, but from clarity: If people would buy parts of that - the parts are called “shares”, and the people who buy them “shareholders”. That is a public company. Which now has a LEGAL OBLIGATION to make as much money as possible. Meaning all that enshittification coming along with it eventually, too.


Well, there ARE torpedoes that pretend to be a ship in order to trick ships and other torpedoes to go for them, instead of the submarine that fired it.
But yeah “specifically” designed to sink ships sounds weird when that’s what most of them, with only few exceptions, do.
I think that’s a slight pun.
The “-archy” part comes from the greek for “to rule/command”. Monarchy = rule by a king, oligarchy = rule by few, etc.
And the “an-” part means “not” or “without”. So anarchy technically means “not ruled” or “without rule” - but if things are still being ruled, it would still be an “archy”, not a “not archy”.