- 0 Posts
- 6 Comments
Randelung@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Open-source game engine Godot is drowning in 'AI slop' code contributions: 'I don't know how long we can keep it up'English
0·5 days agoI was thinking that using selenium or similar would allow the bot to circumvent any block that works in a browser. Since it’s probably not doing a million PRs at once, doing that would be viable. It could even use the cookie from the selenium session to then use the api directly.
Kinda like flaresolver does for prowlarr/jackett.
In which case Anubis is only a temporary measure until the vibe coders wise up.
Randelung@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Open-source game engine Godot is drowning in 'AI slop' code contributions: 'I don't know how long we can keep it up'English
0·5 days agoI’m ignorant 😅 I don’t use either. I guess it doesn’t really defend against browser-remote-controlling bot agents.
Randelung@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Open-source game engine Godot is drowning in 'AI slop' code contributions: 'I don't know how long we can keep it up'English
2·5 days agoCodeberg Anubis when?
Pretty crazy there’s no PKI in place to verify photos, videos, or text. We just need apps to verify signatures and tell users about the origin. Memes can remain unsigned, but veritable information should always be traceable to a source.
E.g. I’m more inclined to believe a video sourced by AP (sent to me by whomever) than one posted by the white house twitter without signature.


I don’t mean cameras. I’m thinking of easy to use signature apps that allow anyone to authenticate sources and you get to decide whether you trust the source or not. The forward from klandma wouldn’t be sourced or maybe by klan news, while you could disregard any “oh my god I’m in the hospital please send monies” picture that isn’t signed.