• 0 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 18th, 2025

help-circle


  • “As disturbing and disruptive the blockades and the convoy protests in Ottawa could be, they fell well short of a threat to national security,” wrote the three judges on the appeal court.

    Anyone watching live feeds could easily tell this was true.

    The thing is that this liberal gov and and the previous one don’t care about what was legal or right, they want their pound of flesh, so I won’t be surprised if they try to take this to the Supreme Court.

    Meanwhile, Chrystia has conveniently left the country, Justin is off somewhere with his astronaut, Mendicino is gone, Blair demoted, Peter Sloly, Steve Bell, Jim Watson are all gone, Jody Thomas is gone… the only people still being persecuted and dragged through years and years of “lawfare” are the convoy organizers. For a LEGAL and PEACEFUL protest as proven in COURT, not in the mass media or the court of public opinion.

    What a screwed up country with no consequences for those who illegally persecuted them and continue to do so.


  • You know that global climate change is actually GLOBAL, right? So 98.5% of the planet’s emissions do not come from Canada. And of the tiny amount that does, its less than half coming from oil and gas. That 0.7% is a rounding error in a computation that greatly depends on what’s input.

    Canada’s O and G sector is NOT the great demon you’re making it out to be - it’s barely a factor in climate change. If you REALLY want to make a change, chase the countries who are major polluters - China and the US - you know, the two places that produce almost ALL the goods you buy and consume. Start with boycotting all your purchases from those two countries and I’ll believe you actually care about climate change.












  • I didnt watch the video (2 hours? No thanks) but I think the judge made it clear that the primary witness gave unreliable and untrustworthy testimony which really sank her credibility in this case.

    It hit peak head shaking wonder when the Crown prosecutor argued that just because she was sucking on a guy’s johnson doesnt mean she was consenting to other sex acts? Specifically “You cannot treat that as a communication of consent to any other sexual act.” Which means, in that lawyer’s world, one must ask consent to every individual act.

    Does that include changing positions good sir? “Uh, just because I did doggy style doesnt mean I consented to reverse cowgirl. How DARE you assume I consented!”

    Hmm, I get the impression these people have never actually had a sexual relationship? Probably just safer to print out a consent form for each act and then have both parties sign before each act to make it clear they were both ok with it. I heard that works /s



  • There are more cases. You can google them. The Democracy Fund has been busy defending these people and getting their jobs back and getting their fines quashed. I didnt say that the vaccines weren’t legitimate. I was presenting the clear fact that people were indeed forced to comply in taking them. And some lost their jobs for not doing it. And some were given ridiculous fines for not doing it. Which contradicts the statement above that no one in Canada was forced to take the vaccine. We most definitely were.