More people or things contributing to a goal does not always add more security/efficiency/capability to achieve said goal.

A classic example is a length of chain.

The more individual links, the more weight the chain as a whole needs to be able to carry.

Each link needs to be able to support the weight of the load and the weight of the entire length of the chain.

More links also introduces more opportunities for links with failure points to be included.

Glyptodon are mammels too, and a direct ancestor of armadillos! The -don in the name does imply dinosaur, so I can see why one would make the assumption.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glyptodon

I suspected, and the archive comment confirmed as much.

https://www.qwantz.com/index.php?comic=4449&butiwouldratherbereading=thelastdinosaurcomicever

$12.5T is about a third of the total, which is $37T. $24.5T is the other ~2/3s

Seems like a lot of math they could argue.

Fine them daily gross income for each identified product for each day since the last inspection with no findings.

Make them beg for more frequent inspections.