• HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    that seems reveresed but even then I have doubt. pharmacies should have plenty of regulation and pharmacist is one of those jobs where you have to be licensed. It kinda sounds like at the end you are agreeing with my statement though that private citizens have never been blocked from doing things in their private lives.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, I was saying that they can and still do what they want, but can/will still face punishment if they decide to do it because individuality has no place in a company setting. Its the company rules that will dictate if they can or can’t do something, and those company rules may also be dictated by laws.

      That pharmacist would (should) have faced punishment because it was at work.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        ah I see what you mean now. your saying the law won’t protect them in that setting. maybe. republicans are pretty good at double standards in the way they do things.