Anarchy is a political structure where there’s basically no one in charge, right? But wouldn’t that just create a power vacuum that would filled by organized crime, corporations, etc.? Then, after that power vacuum is filled, we’re right back at square one, and someone is in charge.

Are there any political theorists that have come up with a solution to this problem?

  • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Most things we do are anarching tbh, like just the simple act of meeting someone while walking on a narrow path means you have to directly communicate with them to get past each other, there’s no higher authority involved that decides who goes to which side, or punishes you if you shove them out of the way.