I feel like bears is the most obvious answer. In this scenario it would have started thousands of years ago. We’d have dozens/hundreds of breeds with different shapes,sizes and characteristics. What do you think would be the most interesting/cool?

  • pasdechance@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 days ago

    There was a video being shared by someone who studies raccoons.

    The tl;dr was they are too smart and tend to hold grudges to become domestic.

    Still, they would be cool pets.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      This argument is always so silly. Domestication is the process of changing animals so they become more suitable to living with humans. The fact that wild animals aren’t domesticated and therefore have traits that are problematic for that is tautological.

      • Paragone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        2 points:

        1. Quolls, in Australia, are apparently about the same smarts as raccoons: you have to childproof EVERYTHING in a house they’re living-in. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quoll ( the article I’d read pointed-out that they’re endangered BECAUSE people can’t have them as pets, whereas cats aren’t endangered & are pets )

        2. grudge-holding may not be amendable, through breeding-program.

        _ /\ _

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          Pretty much any behavioral trait is changeable through natural or artificial selection. That includes intelligence. Actually it’s pretty clear that part of domestication for dogs was making them less intelligent.

          Some species may take longer, and it’s generally a slow process. I doubt these animals will be domesticated during our lifetimes but in the future who knows?

          • OwOarchist@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            4 days ago

            Actually it’s pretty clear that part of domestication for dogs was making them less intelligent.

            There was a scientific study run in the US comparing the behavior of wolves and dogs.

            Within 2 days, the scientists had to add a lock to the door of the wolf enclosure because the wolves had learned by watching them how to open the door and escaped. The dogs kept the same simple door latch throughout the entire experiment and never escaped.

              • OwOarchist@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                4 days ago

                Kind of…

                The domestication of dogs brought out a lot of neoteny traits – juvenile traits retained into adulthood. Our beloved man’s best friend are derived from wolves that never fully grew up and instead remained puppy-like for their entire lives. This makes them smaller, friendlier, more submissive, and easier to train (among other things) … but it also does make them a bit stupider.

          • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Actually it’s pretty clear that part of domestication for dogs was making them less intelligent.

            Had a Mastiff. Can confirm.

    • TheV2@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Even better, if after their domestication they were still smart and resistant enough to not fall into the hands of owners that treat them like toys.