• Art3mis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 days ago

    This was so insanely predictable. I wouldnt be surprised if all the tech giants move to do the same. “you will own nothing”

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not the beginning, ‘Device as a Service’ has been the buzzword as of late, but basically has been a thing for decades. I remember twenty years ago scratching my head at why the company I worked at paid more to lease desktops for three years than it would have cost to just buy them outright, or even finance them.

      • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        The amount we spend on cloud hosting I keep suggesting (and I think they are starting to listen) that having on-prem hardware makes financial sense again. We have the staff to run them already anyway.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Heh, to some extent I think the hardware vendors have done this to themselves.

          They try to balance “good TCO if you just buy it” but simultaneously say “but it sucks to own the equipment you need to pay us exorbitant services fees to make it easier to own”.

          Nothing unique to IT, certainly car manufacturers love to first sell you on how robust the car is and then try to scare you into thinking it’ll turn to dust if you don’t buy extended warranties…

  • THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    I am so happy I built a new computer at the end of 2024. It may realistically last me two decades at this rate. I got one decade out of the last build.

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    On a practical note: we need to mock this to the point that anyone who actually does it will instantly be a social pariah. This needs to be so embarrassingly stupid that the companies who offer it literally blush, something non-human entities typically can’t do. Gamers Nexus had a good video about NZXT doing this and broke down the math for the numerically challenged.

    Any other ideas for making this fail in a country where the consumer protection agencies are often worse than nobody paying attention at all?

  • dunestorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’d rather go back to 2007 and main my Intel Core 2 Duo than rent a PC. We’re going backwards not forwards guys…

  • rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Honestly, the level of doublethink on display by some Apple fans is impressive normally but this is amazing. Apple “defeats” RAM prices by making you pay for something several times over while not actually getting to own it? Fucking bootlickers.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Aaaand there we go, as predicted for the lady decade. You won’t own anything and you’ll like it. You will lease pur hardware and we will know everything about you.

    Fuck all of this

    • tauisgod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      A lot will. My last company leased their hardware. It cost more in the long run but for reasons I never understood it’s better having expenses paid out of opex versus capex.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah, I was in a room with a customer that said point blank “even if it costs us more in opex within a year than buying it as capex, we would rather rent the stuff as opex”

        Some accounting bullshit makes them hate having anything that they must count as an “asset” that goes down in value over time. Better to burn the money as “expense” than to have to manage the value burning off over years as “depreciation”.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Wow! How lucky are we?!! This also happens to coincide with Apple raising chocolate rations from 10 to 8!!!