cm0002@libretechni.ca to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 10 days agoBehold the future of programminglemmy.mlimagemessage-square197linkfedilinkarrow-up1845arrow-down115cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1830arrow-down1imageBehold the future of programminglemmy.mlcm0002@libretechni.ca to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 10 days agomessage-square197linkfedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·9 days agoI love the implication that he’s speaking to the AI and wants to not disturb people, but has no headphones on. so I can only assume it’s responding from the speakers. note Yes, I know it could be responding over text instead of voice.
minus-squareCoriza@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·9 days agoWhich I think it is even more funny, why not just type them if is not a full audio back and forth.
minus-squareMichal@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 days agoBecause it’s faster to speak than type, but reading is more practical than listening, especially if taking information is your main focus. It’s scannable, easier to read and reread selectively important parts, and listening to code is not useful.
I love the implication that he’s speaking to the AI and wants to not disturb people, but has no headphones on. so I can only assume it’s responding from the speakers.
note
Yes, I know it could be responding over text instead of voice.
Which I think it is even more funny, why not just type them if is not a full audio back and forth.
Because it’s faster to speak than type, but reading is more practical than listening, especially if taking information is your main focus.
It’s scannable, easier to read and reread selectively important parts, and listening to code is not useful.