The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agoHe's an arboristlemmy.worldimagemessage-square130linkfedilinkarrow-up1647arrow-down15
arrow-up1642arrow-down1imageHe's an arboristlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square130linkfedilink
minus-squareundefinedValue@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·2 months agoThat’s not how it works with soft bodies though, method B represents potential useable length when pointing down. It’s only distorted because it’s pointing up. For rigid bodies, I’d agree.
minus-squarelightnsfw@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·2 months agoNobody cares how long the limp branches are.
minus-squareundefinedValue@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoNobodies talking about the limp branches, soft and rigid bodies are a physics term and they don’t mean what you think they do.
minus-squarelightnsfw@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoIt was a boner joke, I could not care less about what these words actually mean.
That’s not how it works with soft bodies though, method B represents potential useable length when pointing down. It’s only distorted because it’s pointing up. For rigid bodies, I’d agree.
So… Non rigid?
Nobody cares how long the limp branches are.
Nobodies talking about the limp branches, soft and rigid bodies are a physics term and they don’t mean what you think they do.
It was a boner joke, I could not care less about what these words actually mean.