MuskyMelon@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 12 hours agoShouldn’t the Surgeon General Have a Medical License?www.esquire.comexternal-linkmessage-square22linkfedilinkarrow-up1213arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1213arrow-down1external-linkShouldn’t the Surgeon General Have a Medical License?www.esquire.comMuskyMelon@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 12 hours agomessage-square22linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaresupersquirrel@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·12 hours agoYeah but they aren’t actually a General either, so it is only fair to not have to be a Surgeon.
minus-squarefunkless_eck@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·12 hours agoI’m sure you’re joking, but it’s Surgeon General is to Army General because general in both contexts means “Not limited in scope, area, or application.” (cf “General strike” or “General paralysis of the body”).
Yeah but they aren’t actually a General either, so it is only fair to not have to be a Surgeon.
I’m sure you’re joking, but it’s Surgeon General is to Army General because general in both contexts means “Not limited in scope, area, or application.” (cf “General strike” or “General paralysis of the body”).