Prominent Canadian law professor Michael Geist says a social media ban would fail to protect kids while also posing risks to privacy and free expression for all Canadians.
Yep had high hopes for the internet but people are lazy and cheap. Bow web have this shit ads everywhere and most of the internet is 5 companies. The democrazation we where supposed to have has consolidated to reddit and Facebook.
I can only assume that you’ve never known anyone who lost their life to an opioid addiction. There’s nothing wrong with that; lucky you. I remain in favour of your right to express your thoughts in public even when you have no idea what the fuck you’re talking about.
It wasn’t that it’s a bad analogy that provoked my ire (although it is) — it was more about the apparent intention behind it. The problems with “social media” are not inherent to social media. It’s not a fundamentally dangerous drug, it’s a whole universe of different forms of telecommunication which people have come to rely on in myriad ways, the most prominent of which are badly designed for nefarious reasons that are completely avoidable without demonizing the whole concept. Aim to stop the abusers who’ve taken it hostage, not to abolish the whole concept or restrict it through unconscionable intrusions on civil liberties.
People who say this never lived in a world without social media.
Social media didn’t improve anything. It’s an outrage machine that wastes trillion of hours of people’s lives.
Yep had high hopes for the internet but people are lazy and cheap. Bow web have this shit ads everywhere and most of the internet is 5 companies. The democrazation we where supposed to have has consolidated to reddit and Facebook.
If it’s a wasteful outrage machine why are you here?
Heroin addicts are often some of the most able to recognize the problems with heroin.
I can only assume that you’ve never known anyone who lost their life to an opioid addiction. There’s nothing wrong with that; lucky you. I remain in favour of your right to express your thoughts in public even when you have no idea what the fuck you’re talking about.
Or maybe I do and you don’t get to fucking claim a monopoly on how people make analogies just because you lost someone.
It wasn’t that it’s a bad analogy that provoked my ire (although it is) — it was more about the apparent intention behind it. The problems with “social media” are not inherent to social media. It’s not a fundamentally dangerous drug, it’s a whole universe of different forms of telecommunication which people have come to rely on in myriad ways, the most prominent of which are badly designed for nefarious reasons that are completely avoidable without demonizing the whole concept. Aim to stop the abusers who’ve taken it hostage, not to abolish the whole concept or restrict it through unconscionable intrusions on civil liberties.