jballs@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoI can't be the only one annoyed by thissh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square53linkfedilinkarrow-up1666arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1663arrow-down1imageI can't be the only one annoyed by thissh.itjust.worksjballs@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square53linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarejballs@sh.itjust.worksOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2 days agoI can’t help but think this has got to be an intentionally bad design decision. I’d imagine most people stop using the bottles when they’re 1/4 full but then just throw them away, allowing the company to sell more bottles.
minus-squareMalyca@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 days agoAll I know is there are spray devices in existence that work upside down. Why didn’t they use one?
I can’t help but think this has got to be an intentionally bad design decision. I’d imagine most people stop using the bottles when they’re 1/4 full but then just throw them away, allowing the company to sell more bottles.
All I know is there are spray devices in existence that work upside down. Why didn’t they use one?