Especially as a human can normally consent to death but a pet can’t

  • Lantsu@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Religions and doctors “vowing to protect life.” Especially religious doctors “vowing to protect life” even when the life means just pain and suffering that can’t be properly eased with pain meds either, because you know, the dying person might get addicted to the meds. That’s obviously worse.

    In my country, when an elder person is too sick and “ready to be euthanized”, they just stop giving them water and let them dry to death. It can take weeks. They do give some pain medication, but there is no way of knowing what amount is enough. You’d imagine that dying that way is pretty damn painful yet they don’t have a way of communicating that. But if they OD’ed, it would be murder so better let them suffer!

    But also, euthanizing animals is becoming more taboo too. Many pets live in pain, relying in “pet mobility carts” and medications. Antidepressants for cats, epilepsy meds for dogs… Vets prolong the suffering for money, for people who can’t accept facts and do the kind and right thing. Animals have no way of communicating about side-effects from medications. Endless rehoming is thought to be better than letting go.

      • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I am indeed sorry that Doctors who misunderstood the Bible did that to your grandfather.

        To artificially prolong life in pain and suffering is extremely immoral

    • IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      the Wise know that sometimes, their time has come whatever was created must either perish or have eternal life