Fox News host Sean Hannity dedicated a segment of his Thursday show to deliver a message to Pope Leo XIV, suggesting he and others at the Vatican had totally lost sight of the true meaning of the bible and its teachings.

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The pope does understand the Bible, and he knows damn well that he’s misrepresenting it. That’s his job (and always has been).

    Read the Bible, see for yourself. If you are short on time, just read Revelation (the last book).

    p.s. my most hated comment ever! THANK YOU fuck the pope

    • wavebeam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      This dude is fucking nuts. Revelation is easily the dumbest book of the bible to recommend.

      • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Agreed.

        I mean, it’s my favorite book of the Bible. But it’s the most easily misunderstood and misinterpreted. The whole thing is an allegory written in a particular kind of prose, drawing on tropes common to a genre of writing scholars call “apocalypse.” But given that even lifelong Christians are unaware of this fact means that this is definitely not the book to recommend reading as an entry point. Unless you’re looking for inspiration for something to airbrush on the side of your bitchin’ van (hopefully one with a crescent moon bubble window on the back). Then by all means flip to the section right before the maps and get to sketching!

        • NoTagBacks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          ABSOLUTELY. I love the book of Revelation, but too many don’t understand how to read apocalyptic literature, nor do they understand the source material to contextualize the heavy symbolism. I blame a ton of the dumbshit premillenial dispensationalism crudely hobbled together to resemble a form of eschatology on a poor understanding of Revelation, Dallas Theological Seminary for spreading the fuck out of it, and Schofield for being the dipass to keep it from remaining the obscure hallucinogenic ramblings of a (probably) sick pentecostal woman in England. Man there are so many cool things about the theology of hope and some strong influences of Stoic philosophy(again), but man does American theology love to fetishize about the unbelievers facing a gruesome divine genocide…

          • wavebeam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I don’t really consider myself a Christian anymore, but I have read the bible during the time I did. The only people I ever knew who were way into revelations were fucking stupid ass old people like my wife’s grandfather who was a miserable vindictive old man who had no admirable traits whatsoever. He was also definitely not aware of the intended meaning, he just like the shit about non-believers finally getting theirs.

            Reading that book without the context of other books of the bible and like Paul’s writing in particular is just plain stupid. But I think understanding of also kind of requires other theological understanding.

            • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Reading that book without the context of other books of the bible and like Paul’s writing in particular is just plain stupid.

              Knowing the context makes it worse in my opinion, but you do you.

              You know what’s really stupid? Thinking Jesus is a beacon of peace, He’s horrifying. If you can’t handle Him murdering everybody in a rage, you can’t get through the Bible anyway.

              • NoTagBacks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                This is a pretty silly take. Look, I’m an atheist myself and I’m someone who is of the opinion that religion has been a net negative for humanity, but I also know pretty well what I’m talking about when it comes to Christian theology, eschatology, and biblical principles, and I can tell you don’t know what you’re talking about when it comes to this subject. There’s plenty to be critical of the Bible about, but you haven’t really hit any of the points at all. If you don’t know the subject very well, you probably shouldn’t form such strong opinions on it.

      • 1D10@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s the only “cool” book the rest is boring nonsense.

        The only people I have ever heard qout revelations, are nutters, and people trying to get money. It reads like biblical fanfic.

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, please, read the apocalyptic fever dream of a crazy man as proof that god exists. I’m totally convinced!

      • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The Bible permeates the USA and its government, it’s very useful for understanding why things are the way they are.