• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    it totally looks like this idiot did not know this was not an actual Bible quote

    He knew it wasn’t an actual Bible quote, but he did think it was a modified version of Ezekiel 25:17. Which it definitionally is. The actual string is:

    Ezekiel 25:17 –> (edit: Bodyguard Kiba modification) –> Pulp Fiction modification –> USAF modification

    Whereas he thought it was:

    Ezekiel 25:17 –> USAF modification

    I think that’s understandable if you’ve never seen Pulp Fiction (because you just assume the Pulp Fiction stuff was the USAF’s addition), but it’s still pretty funny.

    The actual problem here, as usual, is separation of church and state being trampled over to make way for Abrahamic prayers in the US federal government.

    • BlackVenom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      25:17 is a small segment of the “verse”… Pulp Fictions rendition is made up all in except the “great vengeance and furious anger…” Part…

      E.g. fake bible verse.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        E.g. fake bible verse

        You mean “i.e.”, and yeah, he said that it’s “reflecting” Ezekiel 25:17.

        “They call it CSAR 25:17, which I think is meant to reflect Ezekiel 25:17.”

        He literally never said it’s an actual Bible quote or even all that close to one.

        • towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yup. It’s not giving an example so “e.g.” doesn’t make sense

          For example fake bible verse