A couple were told they faced a $200,000 (£146,500) medical bill when their baby was born prematurely in the US, despite them having travel insurance which covered her pregnancy.

  • Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    The costs are not comparable, otherwise or healthcare systems would all be bankrupt. And here we don’t have the same incentives to inflate costs.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yes the costs would be different. Perhaps 100,000€ instead of $200,000. The fact remains tourists don’t get free healthcare anywhere.

      This is a complete nothingburger of a story. The couple got treatment. Their insurance was billed, exactly as it would have been if they’d been in Canada or Portugal.

      Their insurance momentarily denied to cover them. Why aren’t we mad at them? Because this clickbait story was created to stoke a pre-existing “America sucks” narrative and get outrage clicks.

      And they seem to have played everyone here perfectly.

      • stephen01king@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Maybe they denied to cover them because of the ridiculously high bill, have you ever thought about that?

        Edit: It seems the cost of a normal birth in Germany is at most €7500 for a tourist with no insurance.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Helllllo the baby was 7 weeks premature and in intensive care for 3 weeks. The cost of a normal birth is totally irrelevant. You didn’t read the article, obviously.

          I paid literally zero for either of my kids births right here in California.

          • Damage@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            My grandpa had a peacemaker installed, we received a (paid) bill for the cost of the operation (idk why or how, but I remember my mother showing it to me), it was 36k€. Sure the stay was shorter, but it’s also heart surgery on a frail patient with lots of other issues.

            • scarabic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              How much shorter was the stay? Maybe we can apply some multiplier. At least the example you’re offering is a fully loaded in-and-out final bill, but all this trying to compare the costs of different medical procedures is fumbling in the dark. We know medical costs in the US are higher, and we usually know by how much. The numbers I see in a quick search are $13.4K per capita annually for the US and $9.6k for Switzerland, likely with better outcomes. Was higher costs the reason this couple’s insurance declined them? Maybe. It’s a fair guess, but that’s all. If someone wants to tell me there’s never any back and forth with their EU public health program before a bill gets paid, nor with the private insurance carriers every EU citizen that can afford them also has, then wow, that will have been the best thing I’ve ever heard about healthcare in the EU.

              Whether cost was the sole issue would have been a great question for the reporter to ask someone. But as you can see, they don’t even need to work that hard at their job to get the outrage clicks they need.