• Cork Oak@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You seem to have extremely poor reading comprehension.

    The point is that slavers used racist pseudoscience to claim that enslaved people were a different, “lesser” species, to justify their enslavement. Not only was this incorrect, but even if it were true it would provide no justification. Speciesism is irrational and the human-invented line between species is completely irrelevant to the moral worth of individuals on either side of that line.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Right, but cows are not the same species as human. Slaves are human. Do you really not see the difference?

      Or are you literally arguing against the entire concept of specication? Becuase if so, then that’s really fucking stupid.

      • Cork Oak@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I said speciesism, not speciation. Again with the reading comprehension.

        You seem to have a conception of species as some magical boundary ordained by God that permits all harm. In reality it is an arbitrary human concept pertaining to evolution and genetic relatedness. There is no inherent moral component to it. Your prescription of moral unworth to individuals of different species from our own is called speciesism, and it does not follow logically from the mere differentiation of species.

        This will be my final comment, because you’re incredibly rude.