I grant you that you’ve answered my first question. My bad for accusing you of not answering it, the message got lost in the same paragraph that was justifying an answer refusal.
I have clarified “what are hoomans” in a well defined manner and I’ll do it again: Hoomans are like any human you don’t know, but it’s been found out that they’re not from the Homo sapiens species.
I also clarified that to have a false equivalency you have to have two different things being regarded as equivalent, which none of my questions have.
What’s the difference between a human and a non-human animal that justifies calling the fisting of one rape and not the other?
I grant you that you’ve answered my first question. My bad for accusing you of not answering it, the message got lost in the same paragraph that was justifying an answer refusal.
I have clarified “what are hoomans” in a well defined manner and I’ll do it again: Hoomans are like any human you don’t know, but it’s been found out that they’re not from the Homo sapiens species. I also clarified that to have a false equivalency you have to have two different things being regarded as equivalent, which none of my questions have.
What’s the difference between a human and a non-human animal that justifies calling the fisting of one rape and not the other?