• EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Eliminating animal products mitigates the problem but it in no way absolves you from our exponential consumption of finite resources, and in many ways it’s naive non-solution.

    Well, I have chosen to not reproduce. So at least my consumption has an expiration date. I’m sure this doesn’t absolve me either, but it’s what it is.

    For example: culling and eating pest animals like deer is not vegan

    There is something truly distasteful about bringing a sentient being into existence for the sole purpose of exploiting it. Although I don’t hunt (or fish), I don’t take issue with it so long as it is done in a responsible manner. I know “responsible” is subjective, but I’m not taking an extreme position on it.

    • stickly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      For the record I 100% agree with both of your positions in practice. We slightly differ on the topic of distaste for exploiting life.

      IMO that’s a function of how many human features we attribute to the life and how we exploit it. Thus it’s very subjective and can only be looked at in the aggregate: slaughtering cows and pigs is distasteful because they bleed and scream like any mammal. Milking is exploitative but it can be a much less invasive process and a more fair exchange for a decent life of domestic animals. Think of the human job of a wet nurse, it doesn’t inherently have to be shitty. In practice its just not feasible to have a benign and symbiotic relationship while providing milk for everyone.

      I’m just here to rail against extreme positions like “all animals must have the same rights”. It’s such a seemingly benevolent statement that’s loaded with much more complex implications when you apply it to reality.